Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
A commonly held view is that in immediate future, thanks to the significant technological development, cars are able to be driven by computers. In spite of some benefits associated with this issue, it is true to say that it will bring a new set of significant negative consequence.
First of all, it should be stuck in the mind that computerization will result in less human error and more speed. Automation, which is considered as a most important feature of modern era, will facilitate those difficult and time- consuming tasks that need to be repeated. Nowadays, there are many modern equipment such as robots that are capable to be programmed to do these task countless number. Driving is no exception, which might be result in less human-related accidents.
On the other hand, replacing driver by computers have several drawbacks. First of all, people dependency on technology will increased dramatically. Consequently, the amount of physical activities would decline which result in more risk of diseases such as obesity or heart disease. Besides, the number of several different job opportunities will reduce. A quick glance at society indicates that thousands of people earn money by driving taxi, bus, lorry or other kind of transportation vehicles. The third disadvantage of robots related to those problems that may occurred during service. This refer to error in program of a component of hardware.
Taking everything into consideration, it seems that drawbacks of computerization outweigh the benefits and can leads to some major negative impact on health and economy of society.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-06 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 78 | view |
2019-02-27 | yaldaasgari | 61 | view |
- Some people are born to be leaders while others believe leadership can be learnt Discuss both views and give opinion 78
- An old friend is coming to town and has invited you to go to the cinema Write to your friend In your letter Explain that you are unable to come Find out how long your friend is staying in town Arrange a suitable time to meet 73
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000. 78
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work shopping and education To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun equipment seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much modern equipment', 'a good deal of modern equipment'.
Suggestion: much modern equipment; a good deal of modern equipment
...eed to be repeated. Nowadays, there are many modern equipment such as robots that are capable to be p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...l, people dependency on technology will increased dramatically. Consequently, the amount ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...r heart disease. Besides, the number of several different job opportunities will reduce. A quick ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...erization outweigh the benefits and can leads to some major negative impact on health...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, if, may, so, third, kind of, such as, first of all, in spite of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31496062992 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09994309936 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629921259843 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7456786297 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14453816784 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425603929293 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422011496658 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812683461904 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539739959006 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.