Some people say that economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stopped immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both side and give your opinion.
Many people have an opinion that, poverty has been reduced due to the progression of economic status. Whereas, it is argued by some that, since economic development has led to pollution, it should be mitigated. This essay will discuss both the perspectives. In my opinion, pollution should be prevented, but it does not mean that economic growth should be stopped.
On the one hand, poverty has been vanished from many countries because of the positive growth in the economy. To cite an example, India was a developing country, many Indians was under the poverty line. Since after the industrialization, the standard of living in India has increased to a greater extent. Although the unemployment rate was high in many countries, with the development of both agricultural and industrial sectors has created plenty of jobs for the citizens and thus it provided basic amenities to all like food, shelter and health care to everyone. In addition, increasing economic condition will also improve the infrastructural facilities, which will attract more visitors as a part of tourism. Therefore, economic growth is a great deal to improve the living standard of people and to eradicate poverty.
Even though economic growth brought many benefits, it is argued by some that, it has a few drawbacks. Firstly, the increased number of cars will show no signs of decreasing pollution. Secondly, the effluents from large factories pollute the water bodies. Last but not least, the energy that we used to produce the products even cracks the ozone layer and gradually contributed for the global warming. If these types of issues not tackled, it will create a lot of health issues like asthma, respiratory diseases and so on.
After analysing both the views, I am think that, economic progression is a great concept to overcome the poverty. Despite thinking about to stop economic growth, we should find some ways to cut the pollution and damage to the environment. For instance, using renewable energy source, proper waste management system and effective recycling methods can collaboratively solve this issues.
To summarize this topic, I would like to emphasize that, poverty is still the biggest head ache in many countries. Hence, in spite of stopping economic developments, we should find effective solutions to eradicate the possible threats from economic growth to the environment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-05-17 | gracegryffin | 67 | view |
2019-03-10 | Ania | 78 | view |
2019-03-10 | Ania | 73 | view |
2019-02-25 | vishal sachdeva | 80 | view |
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages. 73
- Some people believe all the wild animals should be protected while others think only some animal need to be saved Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
- The pie charts show a comparison of different kynds of energy production in france in 2 years. 56
- Most developed countries spend a large proportion of their health budgeys on expensive medical technology and procedures. This money should be spent instead on health education to keep people well. To what extent do you agree with this 61
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... many countries, with the development of both agricultural and industrial sectors...
^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
... After analysing both the views, I am think that, economic progression is a great c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25130890052 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87853860232 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9324158617 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289918244827 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843114153813 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856689954071 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170183598468 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094348269162 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.