Life expectancy is increasing.
What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or negative development?
I think a rise of life expectancy caused by abundant health medicines services and availability of nutritious food in among of people. The rise can make stakeholders to work harder for taking care the old society.
In my mind, the abundant health medicines services and the nutritious food availability around of people are the reasons of life expectancy increase. The overflow of medicines and health services in today have increased the number of people’s life expectancy which are available everywhere and anytime as one of technology development evidences. The increasing is caused by the availability of nutritious food also, because many outlet and brand of foods in the market are competing to increase their market value in among of people views to take their interest. In Spain market, there were many food brands were competing to develop their cheap nutritious foods and many health services were trying to offer their drugs and services in the society. These caused increasing of Spain’s life expectancy in 2016 as the highest in the world witnessing life expectancy average 85.8 years. Therefore, the two reasons are believed to give influence of the rise in among of society.
The increasing of life expectancy will make the governor to extra handle the elder society. Although every person wants to have long lifetime until they are elderly. During their lifetime, they only own productive age before 65 years old, after that they will need protection. For example, because of life expectancy increase in Yokohama, Japan, the local government allocated funds to protect the older local societies in many nursing homes at 2016 year. It was hold because they were already weak as their aging which are mostly more than 63 years old. Accordingly, a rise of life expectancy is the one of negative development which make government to work harder for protect the elder people.
In conclusion, I believe the fear of death and the easy way to surviving are the reasons of life expectancy incline and such trend make the policy holder to work harder for taking care the elderly. After explaining the issue, not only an increase in life expectancy in a country is a good achievement, but also it leads to increasing supervise of the policy holders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Alex Yan | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Alex Yan | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun outlet seems to be countable; consider using: 'many outlets'.
Suggestion: many outlets
...bility of nutritious food also, because many outlet and brand of foods in the market are co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rnor to extra handle the elder society. Although every person wants to have long lifetim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they will need protection. For example, because of life expectancy increase in Y...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1018766756 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73222049954 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463806970509 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5109876843 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.9375 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186035766663 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736384609547 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603349878759 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121230485835 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201656792795 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.