It is better to marry someone who is similar to you, rather than someone who is different from you. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Choosing a life partner is a really important decision in everyone’s life. Each person desires various qualities in his/her life partner. Some think that people who have different from each other they should get married. On the contrary, I believe that a person should marry someone who is similar to him/her. It has various advantages such as it resolves religious conflicts, and share the same test in likes and dislikes.
First of all, someone similar will share the same interest in the same area. Maybe at the beginning of the relationship, this might not be significant but after a few years of leaving together, it makes a huge impact. For example, my best friend is passionate about music and the arts. A few years ago, she met a very handsome young man who was a professional football player. In the beginning, their relationship went well because each of them was willing to discover the other’s world and they were able to put away their own interests and hobbies. After a few years, when the routine has installed in their life, they were not been able to pretend that they spend good time together. In the end, they brooked up.
In addition to that, being similar to your partner will from the start issues that could affect the wellbeing of marriage. As a young adult, ready to start the new life, your partner’s different religious believes might not have a significant value. Still, the questions and issues will occur later in life regarding children’s religious education conflict rises. For example, one of our family friends, Shahid is Muslim. He married to one Hindu girl. In starting their married life; they respected each other religious values. After having a child conflict raised in their life. Muslim prefer to keep their children in a religious school for education instead of public school. This argument became irresolvable; they separated from each other. If the couple would have the same religious orientation this problem will be eliminated by default.
Finally, I think is important for a couple to go in the same direction from an emotional and educational point of view in order for the marriage to resist over the years. In this regard, having the same background and interests helps a marriage. For instance, my husband and I, both are having the same profession. We both are a physical therapist because of that we both can understand the stress of our work profession. We have a lot to share about our work day. It also helps us to push each other boundaries to achieve success in our profession. We attended many seminars and workshops together.
In conclusion, based on my experiences it is actually more beneficial if the people marry someone similar rather than someone who is different from them. It helps to avoid religious problems, sare same likes, and dislikes, and can support each other well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | Greene_Fielder | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | dasepular | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | dasepular | 76 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | ankitapatel | 70 | view |
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Parents are more involved in children’s education than were parents in past. Use specific example and reasons to explain 83
- Summarize the point made in the lecture, being sure to explain hoe they challenge specific claims/ arguments made in the reading passage.The prevailing evidence for man-made climate change is all around us. According to the Met Office, the 10 warmest year 90
- It is better to have friends who are intelligent or to have friends who have a sense of humor. 66
- It is better to marry someone who is similar to you, rather than someone who is different from you. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... respected each other religious values. After having a child conflict raised in their...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 757, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lvable; they separated from each other. If the couple would have the same religiou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, if, may, really, regarding, so, still, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96273291925 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70239398897 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51966873706 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9127922039 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3225806452 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5806451613 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93548387097 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140773037259 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379286596668 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775008339418 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1093262849 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10105143159 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.