The graph below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of freedonia.
The diagram contrast the male and female employment status in six contrasting job sectors in two different years - 1975 and 1995.
As is seen from the given illustration, men were well ahead of women in all the job sectors in reedonia in 1975. However, the scenario changed in 1995 and women employment scenario showed a remarkable progress.
According to the charts, men in freedonia were clearly ahead of female in manufacturing, finance / banking, wholesale and retail trade, defence and non-defence sectors. In manufacturing, more than 600 male employees could be seen against only 300 female employees out of a thousand employees. Apart from the communication sector, the percentage of male employees was far greater than that of females. Among the given job sectors, the public/non - defence sector had the highest of employees while the defence sector had the least ratio of employees.
After 20 years, women showed an outstanding improvement in these job sectors and they went well ahead of men in communication, wholesale and retail trade sectors. They become almost equal in number in finance and banking jobs while the gap between male and female employees number reduced in defence jobs. The only sector still dominated by the male was manufacturing and the job ratio in this sector remained almost the same as it was 20 years earlier.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | xgracetangx | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | kalkipriya Muruganantham | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | NeutronnzZ | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Nishanthini Jegatheesan | 67 | view |
- The graph below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of freedonia. 74
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 61
- The graph below show the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... As is seen from the given illustration , men were well ahead of women in all the...
^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'remarkable progress'.
Suggestion: remarkable progress
...95 and women employment scenario showed a remarkable progress. According to the charts , men in fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ble progress. According to the charts , men in freedonia were clearly ahead of ...
^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...clearly ahead of female in manufacturing , finance / banking , wholesale and retai...
^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ale in manufacturing , finance / banking , wholesale and retail trade, defence and...
^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ees. Apart from the communication sector , the percentage of male employees was fa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, well, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18264840183 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81544328226 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529680365297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.834184899 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23203613096 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991451059511 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574493139489 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162486090787 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519871007454 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.