Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Most people think that children should start studying a foreign language in their middle schools. However, nowadays, it is popular to introduce them earlier. For example, some elementary schools also teach the English language as a subject. Obviously, it contains positive as well as negative influences.
It is obvious that young children learn languages much more easily than teenagers. They always study on the great interests, the strong motivation helps kids acquire language with both ease and fun, that will also remove the barrier between one language and another. Besides, primary timetable allows more frequent, shorter lessons make them approach more easily, thus maintaining learners' enthusiasm and progress. Furthermore, without exerted pressing stress from tests and exams, children may concentrate themselves to a foreign language without anything else.
Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages, the primary education for language learning is not as perfect as it sounds. Firstly, elementary school teachers may not have the necessary language skill themselves. In addition, the secondary school will supply more professional lessons which children can benefit a lot. However, this activity will entirely ruin the interests of language learning for kids, which shift their foreign language interests into the forced and tests. Thus, this should never be put into practice for a better result until secondary schools. So, the primary school should also make some innovative changes for a better lingual atmosphere to cater to kid's interests.
In conclusion, all the contributions made the language learning will benefit both individuals as well as the community, culturally and economically. Thus, the adjustments in primary school will be the key to solve this educational problem.
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in weathy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not. 73
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same period. 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 67
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'kid'.
Suggestion: kid
...a better lingual atmosphere to cater to kids interests. In conclusion, all the cont...
^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... learning will benefit both individuals as well as the community, culturally and economica...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70260223048 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78772240262 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60594795539 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2592518887 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330603940839 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105392429058 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639632243321 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191127423203 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868618471675 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.