Some people believe that to reduce the amount of time people spend commuting (travelling to work), parks and gardens close to city centres should be replaced by apartment buildings for commuters to live in. However, others disagree with this.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Housing complexes are a prime necessity in most of the cities. The people living far away from work areas spend a lot of time commuting to work. Some say that parks and gardens close to the heart of cities should be replaced with apartment buildings so that extensive travelling can be curtailed. However, others differ in their opinion. This essay would argue between both the opinions and conclude with my opinion
On the one hand, replacing parks with apartment buildings will have certain benefits. The time taken by people to travel to their offices will be shortened. The office buildings are usually located in downtown areas of the cities. If people are living in urban outskirts, it is painstakingly time consuming for them to reach the offices. However, if community parks are replaced with apartment buildings, it would not only the travelling cost and time, but would also keep a person fit and fresh throughout the day and would be able to perform high pressure jobs with ease. In a recent survey conducted by Times of India Newspaper had mentioned in the editorial section that people living close to their office premises took lesser sick leaves as compared to people who lived at a distance from the workplace. So definitely living besides your workplace comes with a lot of benefit.
On the other hand, the replacement of leisure facilities with housing projects would have some drawbacks. Firstly, the denial of leisure facilities will result in making people’s lives sedentary. People need some time off in a verdant and playful place in their hectic routines. If parks and gardens are removed, they will lose great facilities where some time can be enjoyed alone or with the family. Secondly, the removal of gardens will cast a negative impact on our environment. Public parks and gardens usually have various plants and trees which are essential for our habitat. For example, Alibagh which was known for its green expanse, is of late undergoing a total obliteration drive by avaricious builders on account of cheap land for commercial or residential purposes. This kind of reckless cutting of trees and plants, is surely going to make it all the more for people to breathe in clean air as all people are aware that plants inhale carbon-dioxide and release oxygen and humans do need oxygen to survive.
In the conclusion, and in my opinion, parks and gardens are essential not only for leisure, but also for our survival. Although, replacing them would ensure less to travel, it would not be a wise decision to undertake considering that the repercussions would be worse.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-29 | prasanta | 93 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | BIBHU KALITA | 96 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development? 11
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development? 84
- Some people say that advertisement targeting children may have negative effects on them, and suggest banning such advertisement as a solution. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 435.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99540229885 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6179800471 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0732663195 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.476190476 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427053918942 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113697549572 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743205663446 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258976658285 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106057131128 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.