The number of people participate in six different courses in pare, 2016

Essay topics:

The number of people participate in six different courses in pare, 2016

The table shows the information about the number of student who attending ielts programs in six different courses (ge, es, test,elfast,webster and warung ielts) in pare, 2016.

Regarding ielts reading and listening programs, ge and es had the highest number of class participant. followed by test and elfast. webster and warung ielts was on the bottom of the list with number of student range from 144 to 155 participant.

Moving to writing task 1 program, there was a slight difference order of the list, which was es ranked first (157) and ge in the second place (155). Subsequently, warung ielts and Webster were on two last place with 150 and 138 students respectively.

Furthermore, in writing task 2 program, webster ranked first (147), followed by three different courses, -warung ielts, es and elfast- at the same level (146). On contrary, ge and es were less interested courses for this program, with similar number of class participant (145).

Despite the variation number of student among the programs, it seems that ge and es were two most popular place for learning (reading, listening and writing task 1 programs). While webster was the most favorite course for acquiring knowledge about writing task 2.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-15 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-11-22 hahoaan 73 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 78 view
2024-11-16 hahoaan 84 view
2024-11-08 chino0301 view
Essays by user wardiati :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Followed
...mber'>number of class participant. followed by class='test'>test and clas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...st and class='elfast'>elfast. class='webster'>webster and class=&...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'program' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'programs'.
Suggestion: programs
...vely. Furthermore, in writing task 2 program, class='webster'>webster rank...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to read'.
Suggestion: to read
...ere two most popular place for learning reading, listening and writing task 1 programs....
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, while, in the second place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 965.302439024 189% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 9.02475247525 4.92477711251 183% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 9.35292642034 2.65546596893 352% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559405940594 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 283.868780488 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.4 1.45097560976 165% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.5361598351 43.030603864 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.3 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0436116003348 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296419487381 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239477294402 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0358478861418 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146216490864 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.2 13.2329268293 236% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -16.5 61.2550243902 -27% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 10.3012195122 199% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 35.04 11.4140731707 307% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.