Bar Chart : the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The figure elucidates the number of two nations’ expenditure on consumer goods in 2010. At first glance, it is evident that the UK has a higher score in expenditure on consumer goods for three different aspects rather than France.
To begin with France, the total of expenditure of France on customer goods is higher in computers and perfume, which made up approximately 375.000 for computers and two times of 100.000 for perfume. In other sector such as cars, books and cameras, it has lower number in which it constituted at four-tenths of 1.000.000, a third of 900.000 and three times of 50.000 respectively.
In contrast, the UK has the highest number in cars, books and cameras, which accounted for just above nine-tenths of 500.000 for cars, just over a half of 800.000 for books and well under 350.000 for cameras. Nevertheless, it solely has lower number for the other two aspects in which it was roughly at seven-tenths of 500.000 for computers and just beneath 150.000 for perfume.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | kheth | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | phungnguyen1611 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Mattia95 | 61 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- The graph below shows the population for India and China since the year 2000 and predicts population growth until 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Map : the changes of various facilities in the city between 2007 and 2010. 73
- Process the lifecycle of a butterfly 64
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists.Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, third, well, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97023809524 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82210033192 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511904761905 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.8090052551 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.166666667 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 5.23603664747 245% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0908900906234 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838374838248 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987562262133 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101567104523 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102011580228 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.