The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how the number of items transferred by four distinct transport ways changed in Britain from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, it is clear that the quantities of goods transported by road, water and pipelines experienced an erratic upward trend, while the number of items transferred by rail remained almost constant during the given period.
As can be seen from the graph that the largest quantities of goods transported both in 1974 and in 2002 was by roads (around 70 and 98 million tonnes respectively), whereas the lowest number of items transferred both in 1974 and 2002 was by pipeline (nearly 5 and 22 million tonnes respectively). In contrast, the number of goods transferred by water stood at 40 million tonnes at the beginning of the period and remained constant throughout the next 4 years. Over the next 4 years, there was considerable growth to roughly 55 million tonnes in the quantities of transported goods by water. After that, the figure plateaued for around 20 years before starting to rise gradually again.
Regarding good transported by rail, the figure showed an erratic downward trend from around 40 to 25 million tonnes in the years 1974-1994. Over the next 8 years, the quantities of goods transported by rail back to the same level as at the beginning.
- Some people believe that it is good to share information in research, business and the academic world. Some others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both the 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96788990826 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77219486842 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509174311927 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.7564520921 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.375 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202699987481 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101937337955 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574482008265 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142940898463 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352212115559 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.