public health
Every time you turn on the television or flick through the page of newspapers, you learn about public health and related illnesses and disorders. Some people believe that government should take steps to introduce new laws pertain to food eaten by individuals to stave off its negative effects whereas others believe that it is a kind of choice that should be given for the persons. In this essay, I will look at both views and express my own idea with examples.
On the one hand, it is argued that government can bring about public health in order to enhancing people’s physical and mental health. Most of the researchers suggest that about 65 per cent of countries experienced nutritious-related implementations, has guaranteed their individuals’ health. In addition, nowadays people lack significant substances including vitamins and minerals. If people took their responsibilities for absorbing these requisite substances, the number of illnesses would decrease substantially and would improve public health. Therefore, the proponents of this idea emphasis the astonishing role which can be played by government to improve public health.
On the other hand, there are people who argue that making the decision regarding nutritious foods are for the people. Even though this idea tends to be controversial and can cause arguments, however, it is said that every human must have the right of choice whether for food or other issues. What is more, it should be taken into consideration that current economic crisis, makes it difficult to adopt new measures because the ones are struggling with these days way of life. Consequently, it is pointed out that this problem can be tackled individuals.
In conclusion, despite lots of controversial arguments related to public health issues whether to be solved by government or people, personally, I believe that government can affect strikingly because of its wealth and power to introduce much more effective laws. Also it should not be forgotten that without people’s participation, this subject would be frustrating to be addressed effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-26 | liensunny | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | nguyenkhangtriem | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | nguyenkhangtriem | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... to introduce much more effective laws. Also it should not be forgotten that without...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42121212121 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13129439551 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0859278265 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.785714286 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257091881677 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100346248002 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128583304465 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163036724217 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143523630793 0.056905535591 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.