The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.
The table compares the conversion in the number of inhabitants who went to work by bicycle, in twelve locations in the United Kingdom, from 2001 to 2011.
Overall, the number of commuters cycling to work rose dramatically in ten years, and inner London had the highest percentage of changing in the periods.
During this time, in inner London, the number of residents cycling increased significantly from 43,494 in 2001 to 106,219 in 2011, and this changing rate was the highest point (144%). By contrast, although outer London had the second highest people who went to work by bicycle in 2001, the proportion change of commuters was only 45% which was the least in ten years.
The percentage changing, in Brighton and Hove and Bristol, was the second (109%) and the third biggest (94%) at the end of the periods, respectively. In the periods, the number of residents cycling to work in remain eight areas also climbed up, but always below 10,000.
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the oldhouses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom tobuild houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The table below shows the proportions of people using several mobile phone functions between 2006 and 2010. 89
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 61
- Today, humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the United Kingdom, from 2001 to 2011. Overall, the number of commuters cycling...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 1615.20841683 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 161.0 315.596192385 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90683229814 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 4.20363070211 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55920218751 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 176.041082164 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534161490683 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 506.74238477 43% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.861305237 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306462659543 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149876056886 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854787295673 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178286828978 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174005657281 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 78.4519038076 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.