Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor-bike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Driven license becomes a basic requisite in modern people’s lives. However, more and more problems about road safety are occurred consequently because of the huge members of young drivers. Some people suppose that the best way to improve this situation is to limit the age of those young drivers as a higher threshold, while I believe that other measures are equally effective.
Obviously, increasing the minimal legal age is an efficient way to cut road accidents. This is because those people with higher legal ages could take their own responsibilities better. Their behaviors and brains are controlled more physically and rationally by themselves. At the same time, many theoretical knowledge which could help them understand the construction of cars and motors would be taught and real cases would teach them how to deal with an accident in a calm manner from the higher education.
Nevertheless, I believe other alternatives should be taken into consideration as well. It is common for most countries that only those people who become legally adults with strict training could have a driven license. Therefore, they already have appropriate abilities to cope with those traffic emergencies in many cases. By contrast, government should focus on raising drivers’ awareness of road safety as a priority. This lies in the fact that most people do not experience the horrors on the road and the harm they have brought to the victims. Those videos about real accident become the active voice in deterring some rebellious and impulsive young drivers. Apart from that, there should be more legal stringent punishment enacted by law enforcement against to regulate all drivers’ behaviors.
In my opinion, it is the responsibility of every member of a society to help the road safety become better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | moeinynsi | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | christine amelia | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | sugussun1994 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | sugussun1994 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | sugussun1994 | 56 | view |
- In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work and communicate via the internet without face-to-face communication. Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor-bike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 67
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor-bike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much theoretical knowledge', 'a good deal of theoretical knowledge'.
Suggestion: much theoretical knowledge; a good deal of theoretical knowledge
...onally by themselves. At the same time, many theoretical knowledge which could help them understand the co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a calm manner" with adverb for "calm"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...teach them how to deal with an accident in a calm manner from the higher education. Neverthel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, in many cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28275862069 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88040656398 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593103448276 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0850608156 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.133333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198864218637 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624228622721 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540601098402 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114678312808 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332225299679 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.