Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people claim that not individuals, but the government should be responsible for protecting the environment. While I accept that the authorities do have an important role in reducing environmental pollution, I would argue that every single person still plays a crucial part in preserving the environment.
On the one hand, I agree that the government can be a driving force in fighting against pollution. First, the government could introduce laws to limit emissions from factories, this is because of the gas emissions from factories in many industrial. This measure can offset Co2 emissions and significantly decline air pollution. Furthermore, the authorities have the financial capability to invest in renewable energies from solar, wind and water power to replace fossil fuels. This is because fossil fuel exploitation has depleted ecology with extinction whereas renewable fuels are produced from clean sources and this energy do not affect the environment. As a result, that helps people preserve ecosystems.
However, I would argue that although the authorities can be necessary, individuals can also make a tremendous contribution to protecting and keeping the environment clean. Firstly, people should plant trees around their house. The plants will release oxygen and absorb carbon dioxide that causes environmental protection. Secondly, individuals can reduce the use of plastic bags and replace them with those made of environment- friendly or recyclable materials. For example, when going shopping, consumers can use cloth bags to contain groceries, likewise, they can also opt to take a piece of cake with paper packing from a bakery.
In conclusion, while I agree that the government is important to some extent in protecting the environment, I believe that citizens are also important elements.
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishmentson driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun industrial seems to be countable; consider using: 'many industrials'.
Suggestion: many industrials
... of the gas emissions from factories in many industrial. This measure can offset Co2 emissions ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55035971223 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05193092763 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604316546763 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5172651702 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204621226424 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611245537564 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495886944233 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121567456765 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323837188338 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.