Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today's world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As an old saying goes "Time is money", people tempt to rush their works in order to save their time for more works. It seems that an efficient worker is a worker who can finish most of the works in the same period of time. However, in my opinion, what it matters is the quality of the work instead of the quantities. Work slowly sometimes can be more efficient than rush your works, let me elaborate.
First of all, the fast pace of works makes more mistakes. When people trying to rush their works, they would not have time to pay attention to tiny errors such as typos. Moreover, these tiny errors are hard to detect after the work has been done, and on top of that, sometimes a tiny error may exist in another tiny error. Worst of all, the new works may be on the basis of another work that has errors. It is like building a house on an already corrupted fundamental, which would lead to an inevitable disaster.
Besides, when people need to finish their works in a short time, they would use less time on planning their work. On the contrary, when people have plenty of time, they can come up with a well-defined plan. It is dangerous to start your work without a good plan, it would be too late to realize that there are some errors in the works that already done.
Another reason that supports works slowly is better is that works slowly benefit the quality of life of the workers. It is easier to have a clear and positive mind when the workers know that they do not need to rush their works. On the other hand, when the works are under the pressure of time, they may work overtime to finish the works. And that may deteriorate the health of the worker both mentally and physically.
Finally, it is my contention that due to having a well-defined working plan and a clearer mind, the slow worker can actually work more efficiently and finish their works with higher quality. Therefore, work slowly is superior to work quickly.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today's world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- the decline of yellow cedar 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today's world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today's world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Ethanol fuel 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...an finish most of the works in the same period of time. However, in my opinion, what it matter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49438202247 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28336060215 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474719101124 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5398141693 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8888888889 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.45110844103 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206416522308 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847288499689 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678459170477 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137458151215 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350943022281 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.