online shopping sales for retail sectors in canada in 2005 and 2010
The pie chart illustrates changes of online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 measured in percentage. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement was obviously in food and beverage retail sector whilst the most dropped down trend dramatically happened to be in home furnishing sector.
Based on the data, food and beverage had to be in the most sharply increased retail sector which made up to 10% in that period. The upward trend then followed by video games sector even though it was not as sharp as the former but it went up from 18% to 23% respectively.
On the other hand, the most climbed down retail sector happened to be in home furnishing sector category which was obviously falling down from 25% to 15%. Then the descended sale followed by percentage of 10% dipped down of the electronics and appliance retail sector
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-07-05 | jasmine.27 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-28 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
- young people are thrusted to work or travel for a year in their transition time after highschool to collage 67
- Global sales of games software, CDs, and DVD or Video 89
- British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to english in 2000 and 2010 67
- Some people believe that children leisure activities must be educational; otherwise they are complete waste of time 73
- One government’s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts event in the same years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'games'' or 'game's'?
Suggestion: games'; game's
...The upward trend then followed by video games sector even though it was not as sharp ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77483443709 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51132254647 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3438797446 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349464932358 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196139824566 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209534739742 0.0843802449381 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236256346593 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150797694157 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.