GraphBooks-read by women and man

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph gives information on how ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years period at Burnaby Public Library. As shown in graph, number of books read ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the highest'.
Suggestion: to the highest
...umber was increasing each year and came to highest point in 2014. In 2014 mens read approx...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... mens read approximately 14000 books. As is observed, in 2011 womens read more...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... claimed to read almost 10000 books. But , from 2013 to 2014,number of books read ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ens decreased to less than 8000 books. To put in simply, womens read more books...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... put in simply, womens read more books I 2011,but mens read more in 2014.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 570.0 965.302439024 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 124.0 196.424390244 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59677419355 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.33699396548 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22931738431 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572580645161 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 142.2 283.868780488 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1029223885 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.3333333333 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.7777777778 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 5.23603664747 6% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272789214574 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155151966622 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738965712322 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189532249936 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775922757488 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 100.58 61.2550243902 164% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 2.5 10.3012195122 24% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.7 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.