Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom
Being aware of social and political knowledge is crucial for students. However, how they can get access to that information generated many controversies. In my opinion, the teachers should not impose their belief into the students. I feel this way for three reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
Teacher's opinion can impact students mentality easily. We all know our teacher as a person who has a stable mind and often does not make many mistakes. They are aware of every knowledge that we are willing to learn and have more experience than we have achieved as a child. In this way, whatever they argue about, students will believe without any consideration. I can explore it in one sentence. This is unfair. When we have cancer or sickness, we definitely refer to a doctor. Doctors are well-known people who can help us to cure our disease. Whatever the doctors recommend we will do without any hesitation. Because we assume that doctors do not tell lies and improving our health conditions is their priorities. Teachers are not different from this measurement. Teachers by expressing their thoughts, impose their school dwellers to accept their opinions.
Moreover, spreading personal ideas by teachers can waste a lot of time. Students attend the schools to learn educational materials, not listen to teachers advice. When I was in school, I had a mathematics teacher who loved to talk about his personal beliefs. Everybody could spread their ideas and take part in the class discussion. We found it very appealing. However, we were neglected this matter that we were losing many times. In the end, not only we could not make a solid conclusion of our debates, but also we did not learn anything and Consequently, I failed the final exam.
Finally, imposing premade ideas can destroy students creativity. Each person should find his ways of extracting new information, which can help him to approach to a problem through different angles. I saw many students who become reluctant of education, just because they refute the opinions of their teachers. In this way, they do not follow their teacher's thought, even though they express the truth.
In conclusion, teachers must avoid sharing their ideas in the class. In this way, not only students become deprecated from the truth but also it wastes a lot of time
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. Agree or disagree? 70
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 70
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- do you agree or disagree with the following question? in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...avoid sharing their ideas in the class. In this way, not only students become depr...
^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e truth but also it wastes a lot of time
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, moreover, so, well, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98461538462 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68399694099 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54358974359 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0722990685 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.0344827586 100.406767564 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4482758621 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55172413793 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229242659523 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599687211545 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560151356891 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131645616505 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174195602995 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.