Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.
Development of science and technology has many effects on people's lives and they should know them well. Being aware of the situation of modern life leads to better organization of these situations. So, to some extent, I subscribe to the idea that young people should have a special ability to manage this life. First, having a plan for the youth life help them to adapt themselves better with a variation of modern life. Predicting and planning for solving some problems that modern life brings for people is really critical for them. For instance, technology is rapidly developing and they should be aware of these changes. Youths need to use them in their job to keep a high range of productivity. If they do not know more about them they will lose their job or maybe they will lose their customers. Since planning for controlling modern life change helps young people to preserve their economic situation.
Second, some changes in modern life that are related to political changes are really ambiguous for youth so they should learn a different way to control these situations. Youth usually have a special goal that is affected by some political choices. For example, some of them hope to continue their studies in a foreign country to improve their academic resume. However, political decisions force them to omit some countries that have high-rank universities from their list because their country is banned for some reason. So planning for overcoming some political obstacles is really important for them because they need to improve the level of their academic life.
However. I believe that planning and organization cannot help youth in some field such as unknown diseases that create because of wrong habits of people in metropolitan cities. Eating some harmful foot or having few physical movements lead to inventing of some disease such as cancer or high pressure that does not have a certain treatment. So in this way youth cannot control their health just by planning. It needs some improvement in medical science that helps doctors to cure peoples.
In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, youth should have the ability to plan for their modem life. Since some changes such as scientific or political changes affect their lives. They should plan for their future to control the prosperous of their job or academic field. However, planning is not enough for controlling some unknown diseases that create in people’s life by changes in modern life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Vishnupri | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | naziii | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | zahra.tmmm | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | zahra.tmmm | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 90 | view |
- the advantage and disadvantage of allocating tax to unhealthy behavior 76
- in the past it was easier to identify what kinds of careea have successful future 3
- because modern life is complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 70
- a person should never make an impoetand decision alone 73
- in the past it was easir to identify what kind of career or job lead to successful future 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ove the level of their academic life. However. I believe that planning and organizati...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, really, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10024449878 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59034194924 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457212713936 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0315754947 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8181818182 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5909090909 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287011408922 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110850292897 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100865987455 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197379127872 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838964686078 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.