Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It has been argued by a significant number of individuals that recent development in the technology has made life of an individual more friendly. Whereas others contradict and believe it is the affecting the social network negatively. Before reaching a conclusion, both the views will be discussed.
On the one hand, technology has opened up new avenues in the way we communicate with another person situated anywhere on the globe. It has enabled us to connect and share information with people irrespective of their location. These technical gadgets are helping individuals to remain connected with anyone around the world. For instance, mobile phone with internet connection provides a great combination to communicate with the people surrounding without wasting time in travelling to meet them physically like in older days.
On the other hand, technology takes away the physical aspect of communication. This limitation can make people feel an absence of the human touch and can take away from the clarity of a message and the addiction of the technology keeps the person isolated from the society. To illustrate, the usage percentage of mobile phones by youth has risen to the 45 percent, thus keeping busy in their mobile phones instead of talking face to face with people is a big disadvantage.
In conclusion, while technology to some extent is preventing youngsters by making them addicted with the tools, I am of the opinion that technology has opened different ways to communicate with people at any time with anyone, thus it makes the difference and keeps the technology as a useful social tool to contact.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 67 | view |
2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 78 | view |
2019-12-10 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Some employers for their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs,believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects of t 61
- Write a letter to a friend. You have borrowed something from your friend and it got damage.1. Apologize for damaging the product2. Explain what happened3. Say how you are going to fix the issue 73
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Many people think advertisements are not useful for customers while others think that they are important for customers. Give your opinion. 89
- Some employers of er their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs,believing that this will make their staf healthier and thus more ef ective at work. Other employerssee no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects of t 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 528, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eet them physically like in older days. On the other hand, technology takes away...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15151515152 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91425520146 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9298326597 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.636363636 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192632512628 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647139787237 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522241993917 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117346227807 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554162129242 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.