Many museums charge for admission fees while other are free
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to the museum outweigh the disadvantages?
In a lot of museums, people usually pay some entrance fee whereas others do not charge at all. Charging the public for entry into the institution, in my opinion, has more detrimental effect than the benefit. In this essay, I will, with the aid of reports from both the University of Nigeria (UN) and the Nigerian Education Board (NEB), analyse both the advantage and disadvantage of this action.
On the one hand, paying fees to access the museum could promote the value of the artifacts in the institution. This is because people often perceive the value of objects from the perspective of price. According to the UN in 2013, a research on value showed that prospects tend to rate paid goods or services higher than the free ones. The Mona Lisa painting in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, for example, is rated higher than the ones we see almost everywhere. The admission fees, therefore, if encouraged, highly valued would the objects be.
On the other hand, the museum's admission fees may be a factor causing the deficiency of knowledge among youths in the society. The NEB in 2012 reported that about 22% of high-school students do not really have sufficient information about their subjects. This is likely due to the fact that, in order for them to access valuable information in the museum's archive, they have to pay. Since most of these youths are not financially bouyant, and therefore cannot pay, they are mostly restricted from acquiring knowledge from the institution.
In conclusion, although the admission fees tend to add value to the objects in the museum, the shortage of knowledge amongst juveniles is a huge setback, and should not prevail. Therefore, I believe the disadvantage of paying entrance fee far outweighs the advantage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-14 | adeagboridwan | 78 | view |
- Should private schools receive government funding? 56
- Last week yout friend looked after your children so you could attend a weddingWrite a letter to your friend. In your letter- thank them for looking after the children- describe the wedding- invite your friend to dinner to say thank you 73
- Shopping is now a common leisure activity for youths in many countriesWhy is this the caseIs this a positive development 78
- The behaviour of students in class is becoming worse and worse.What has led to the situation?What can be done to solve it? 11
- The number of old people around the world is increasing dramatically.Could this have more positive or negative effects on society? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... of price. According to the UN in 2013, a research on value showed that prospects tend to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'museums'' or 'museum's'?
Suggestion: museums'; museum's
...objects be. On the other hand, the museums admission fees may be a factor causing ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, really, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98979591837 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72522856808 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3473933924 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.785714286 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264017876527 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828548406135 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579393704559 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151200929208 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253610062769 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.