Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school.
What are the reasons? What could be done?
In this day and age, there are many things around that influence on students and they struggle to focus on the lecture in class. This essay will examine several causes as well as solutions to this.
There are several reasons that can be attributed to influence on students concentration. The primary reason is the distraction from technology devices such as computers, smartphone, high-tech toys. Messaging with friends or playing online games from the smartphone not only reduce the concentration of students but also bring several issues to their eyes. The second reason is lack of interest in the lectures. For instance, instead of sitting and watching the studies that is bored, students are more likely to focus on smartphones or watching videos on the internet or even sleeping.
However, there are several measures that can tackle such problems. First, school leaders can introduce regulations which restrict technology devices during class hours. In some private schools, smartphone is banned and not allowed to use in classroom areas and students have to pay their attention to leaning. Also, the teachers need to create more interesting lectures to inspire their students. When they feel attractive, they would concentrate in a natural way. In addition, it is important to find a source of motivation such as friends or passionate subjects.
In conclusion, the lack of concentration at school might due to the influence of technology devices or the boring of lessons. However, there are various of measures that can be taken to mitigate those issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-22 | ndiep | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | tryuxtlsoxwsfdidxj@miucce.com | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | baymiengdat | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-19 | tryuxtlsoxwsfdidxj@miucce.com | 56 | view |
- the bar graphs show the number of people who were affected by noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2017 79
- In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should beoffered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary educationto those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 78
- The bar chart illustrates the frequency with which Americans ate in fast food establishments from 2003 to 2013 58
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate withPeople via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... that can be attributed to influence on students concentration. The primary reason is th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a natural way" with adverb for "natural"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...feel attractive, they would concentrate in a natural way. In addition, it is important to find a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26294820717 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79814045511 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577689243028 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3760898817 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177300257188 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528394885197 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425371480997 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978772949619 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300945539628 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.