what roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change?
Recently, phenomenon of the climate change has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what roles should government, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change?" Whereas it is a widely held view that indivisuals do not have any role, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the climatology standpoint, global cliamte change are bound up inextricably with global warming, which indicates they lead to both the dessert zoes and an increase in temprature. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2019 demonstrates the relationship between carbone dioxcide emission and the dry season as well as an exponential increase in water cycle. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far suppoerts the contention that the likelihood of solving climate change issus is correlated positively with not only government but also individuals.
Within the realm of economic, without the slightest doubt, companies attribute to air polution, in that it would come down to deforestiration of tropics, fetile soil, and the Earth's atmosphier. A salient example of such attribution is usingpublic transport, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take indivisual role for granted. Hda there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the global warming effects problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of government.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that government, individuals, and companies must be accountable for this issue. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | a.aghyi1989 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | shivek | 92 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | alireza_esml@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | myenglishgrammar | 77 | view |
- What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates? 80
- World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership. So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership. 85
- Mass media 11
- ’In future illiterate will not be those who cannot read, but those who do not learn’ – By some writer. Discuss what do you understand by this statement and state your reason. 85
- You are given climate as the field of study. Which area will you prefer? Explain why you picked up the particular area for your study? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to pinpoint the global warming effects problems. Hence, it is reasonable to inf...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66077738516 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19077945895 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6925795053 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.2408000715 50.4703680194 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.636363636 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220882573702 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592843647611 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113162881685 0.071462118173 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132024498361 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159150465497 0.0609392437508 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.94827586207 211% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.