A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In today's modern world, several institutions of the past have been completely forgotten by our generation. Thus, it is evident that a big part of the population considers the social status and material possession as the most important criteria for a persons quality. Unfortunately, trust and honor have lost their significance over the decades. Personally, I agree completely with this statement and this essay will discuss several reasons explaining my opinion.
To begin, it is undeniable that we live in a society and a century in which goods have a dominant role. With the rapid development of technology, a new phenomenon appeared in the world and that was consumerism. To explain that, consumerism was born by the desire of people to buy more and more materials which mostly may be useless. The impact, unfortunately, of this way of living and thinking is the reason for the decline of human values. For example, several worldwide magazines instead of presenting academic members o our generation, the make lists of the richest people. Regretfully, this changed the way we used to judge people.
To continue, another reason for this alteration is the fact that people and especially the younger ones have idealized celebrities. While a few decades ago, highly educated people were idols of the new era, nowadays, they have been replaced by people who became well known due to advertisements. Several examples of teenagers that follow blindly the way that celebrities dressed or behave can be given. The social status of someone became a reason to be considered worthy.
To conclude, it is apparent that the society that we live is in a huge morality crisis. Honor and trust are not important qualities anymore. However, all together we can reverse this situation which may have detrimental consequences in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | Leauren | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Nweze christabel | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Nweze christabel | 67 | view |
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action.Discuss both views and give your opinion.Give reasons 89
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons f 78
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for you 78
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. why do you think it is happening. Is it a negative or positive development? 78
- In order to find a good job, people should have a university degree.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hanged the way we used to judge people. To continue, another reason for this alt...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecame a reason to be considered worthy. To conclude, it is apparent that the soc...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imental consequences in the future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1644295302 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92372018556 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3642249888 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5294117647 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135749595163 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441593237717 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447845875777 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792432459249 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364424275071 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.