Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
As phrased by the author, for a leadership position in order to justify it one is not required to know about the past whereabouts of the people they lead which seems to be a bit slacky in various ways as the leader is often the one who is supposed to take the entire group into consideration before making any decision . His ability to take his group into confidence to act in certain way is what makes him a leader.Being ignorant to the past behavior of his people will only show his carefree attitude which is not at all justifiable for an effective leader.
Often the leader comes across certain situations where he has to decide which member in his group will be a good choice in order to complete the work effectively for which he has to know a little more about each of the group member than is written on his resume. Knowing more about the group members is often helpful for a leader in order to keep his group away from unnecessary tensions that arise due to the pre conceived notions of the members.
Say for example in situations if the leader is not aware of the past behaviour of its one of the group member who has a habit of leaking the confidential stances of the group and has shown such behavior in the past then it would prove to be quite difficult for the leader
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 42
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...consideration before making any decision . His ability to take his group into conf...
^^
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Being
... certain way is what makes him a leader.Being ignorant to the past behavior of his pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 14.8657303371 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 2235.4752809 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 239.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38493723849 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42154679676 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 215.323595506 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514644351464 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 704.065955056 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.2370786517 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 23.0359550562 204% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4072066223 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 209.6 118.986275619 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 47.8 23.4991977007 203% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109341798866 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672378057403 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033170057468 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779492265916 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266521214137 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 14.1392134831 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.1743820225 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.01 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 100.480337079 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.8971910112 227% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.8 11.2143820225 185% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.