Should universities penalize students for late submission of their work?
The implication of penalize students by the universities for late submission of their work, which is fairly debatable has now gained further attention from numerous arenas. The sizeable influence of these subjects has generated controversy over the potential impact of this trend. i will support this view with arguments in the following paragraphs.
At the outset, there are diverse reasons why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that if universities punish the students for their late submission of work then students brings more responsibilities on them and students make their self-punctual. Furthermore, this punishment motivates them to complete assignments on time.
In addition there are some other reasons like it thing reduce the tutor’s responsibility. Consequently it also prepares students for their future employment where deadlines are strict. Moreover students start doing the hard work in their life.
The importance of penalize students for their late submission of work can be debated, but the facts remains that there were several factors that lead to this theme and matter. Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that it is beneficial for the students if universities punish them for late submission of their work because when they know that if they submit their work late then they penalize them. It can be predicted that in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-03 | yasamin62 | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | yasamin62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | jashan randhawa | 89 | view |
- The Government reduce their investment in arts, music and painting agree or disagree 77
- In some countries, the no of shooting increase because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Should universities penalize students for late submission of their work? 77
- Give your opinion whether formal written examination is an effective way to assess students. 55
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: I
...ver the potential impact of this trend. i will support this view with arguments i...
^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ver the potential impact of this trend. i will support this view with arguments i...
^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... to complete assignments on time. In addition there are some other reasons like it th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...reduce the tutor's responsibility. Consequently it also prepares students for their fut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... employment where deadlines are strict. Moreover students start doing the hard work in t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n be predicted that in the near future.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40789473684 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94714324014 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.413609883 50.4703680194 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.090909091 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.542262542182 0.242375264174 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186215580208 0.0925447433944 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187580120827 0.071462118173 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325745419066 0.151781067708 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929176626312 0.0609392437508 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.