Wild animals are of no importance in the twenty-first century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, it is generally believed that wild animals are no longer important for human beings as they used to be. Therefore, any conservation efforts are wasteful. Personally, I totally disagree with this statement.
For a variety of reasons, it would be harmful for the ecosystem if any of species die out. Apparently, all fauna and flora play an indispensable role in the food chain because one species feed on others for survival. Such feeding habits help facilitate the life cycle of nature. Therefore, the absence of one species might lead to extinction of others. A good illustration of this can be seen in a lot of African savannahs. When the living conditions become inhospitable during the dry seasons, the number of predators, such as lions and cheetahs, drops significantly. As a result, there are not enough predators around to keep herbivore population in check. They grow in numbers and ravage the vegetation.
Apart from the abovementioned practical concerns, without conservation efforts, the disappearance of wild animals would also cause massive losses to humanity. Animal trading is a major industry and generates handsome profits for many organisations. Thus, businesses will suffer from great financial losses if there are no wild animals left to trade, which in turn can bring down the economy of a nation. Worse still, our future generations will lose opportunities to gain practical knowledge by seeing these animals . Instead, people in the next decades will be only looking at pictures or videos of animals.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that wild animals are critically essential not only for the ecosystem but also for humans. Hence, there should be efforts to protect them from vanishing.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-04-23 | nghialeminh | 61 | view |
2019-08-06 | nightfly1711 | 78 | view |
- Wild animals are of no importance in the twenty-first century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- “I fear the day when technology will surpass human and we will have a generation of idiots”, said Einstein. Technology nowadays has developed an unimaginable speed while our communication skills have become worse.To what extent do you agree or disagre 89
- These days, people in some country are living in a "throw-away" society which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away.What are the causes and problems of this? 84
- Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generations companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire.Do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ctical knowledge by seeing these animals . Instead, people in the next decades wil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, apart from, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34519572954 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00969210503 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669039145907 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0014619602 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4444444444 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6111111111 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178966652789 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451733391121 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522379109669 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110617795387 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061605537007 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.