Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it a positive development while others think it is negative development.
Discuss both points and give your own opinion
Recently, I read an article about future electronic apparatus, which are supposed to be smarter than human beings. In the article, some social workers state that they will pose problems to humanity, while some scientists believe that they will benefit people. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of positive impact.
Let us start with reasons why some social workers advocate that intelligent computers will cause a great deal of complications to people. The first reason is that they will lead to large unemployment. These devices are more likely to substitute plenty of employees, as they will be both cheaper to hold as well as capable to work constantly than humans. Another reason is that they will be able to take control of the world. Computer programs, which will learn to make their own decisions, will decide, for example, to conquer human beings, since they will want to become independent. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that computers will result in complications for humans, if they become cleverer.
However, some scientists propagate that intelligent computerized devices will be advantageous to the civilization. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, they will help people solve many insoluble problems. Smarter devices will be able to address many issues, which people are not capable to deal with, because they can easily both analyze unsolved them and suggest optimal solutions. Secondly, they will help to work in extreme conditions. People can apply various smart gadgets, for instance, in dangerous environments to do certain tasks, because unlike creatures they will not die from radiation. As a result, it is rational to say that mainframes will be helpful, if people make them more intelligent.
In conclusion, even though some social workers believe that smarter machines will be detrimental to humans, for the above mentioned reasons I think that these smart systems will bring a multitude of advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-02 | ramanhundal | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | gur1040894 | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | gur1040894 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | ramanhundal | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-23 | gur1040894 | 61 | view |
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.Discuss both and give your opinion. 84
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.To what extent do you agree? 84
- Do you agree that the advantages cars bring outweigh the disadvantages 89
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 73
- Nowadays for many people the Internet is replacing regular books. What extent do you agree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...s, as they will be both cheaper to hold as well as capable to work constantly than humans....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27102803738 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73290588302 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548286604361 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2181180578 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5294117647 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253142194362 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886123073803 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434091791378 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165479008727 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473917569125 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.