Some people believe that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit. Others believe that formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.
Most people promote that the purpose of education is to free the mind and spirit of an individual. But the system of formal education that is practiced upon today is flawed in such a way that the students within this system are not able to rise up to their full potential. Therefore I do support the argument wholeheartedly.
Education is a right that each person deserves to have. Only a well-educated person would be able to appreciate and understand the world around us. From the very origin of the human race to the meticulous details of human anatomy, education allows us to set our mind free. But the system we have which forces students to cram up these various concepts and test their abilities on the basis of an exam which is conducted unscientifically. These actions detriment the curiosity and enthusiasm a student has for these subjects.
Many successful personalities like Steve Jobs and Albert Einstein did not complete their formal education. They believed that what they taught at schools and institutes leads to the diminution of the essence of most subjects by conceptualizing theories rather than bringing them into practical use. A graduate of the present-day education system would not be able to contribute anything to the real world with practical applications.
Also, the system that is present now forces people to take a myriad of exams to go for their graduate studies or any other form of education. The number of assignments and exams a student goes through his education life is implausible and not pragmatic. Moreover, these tests do not promote thinking out of the box, but rather the ability to cram up concepts. This tends to make students think much more mechanically than intuitively. This will ultimately lead to dormancy in the innovations that human beings produce.
As a conclusion, the formal education system today has its set of flaws that detriment the quality of education students receive. With proper revision by consulting proper educational analysts, the system must be revised to encourage the students to think pragmatically and intuitively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | sushil koirala | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | seonjungkim | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | Amber Li | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Raian Islam | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | kelp | 50 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 58
- Some people believe that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit. Others believe that formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ble to rise up to their full potential. Therefore I do support the argument wholeheartedl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'actions'' or 'action's'?
Suggestion: actions'; action's
...ch is conducted unscientifically. These actions detriment the curiosity and enthusiasm ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12790697674 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94722715748 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549418604651 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6147480302 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263215399079 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757906873904 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943360596261 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138496145652 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539031486376 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.