Line graph

Essay topics:

Line graph

The line graph highlights the amount of query made by customers regarding tourist information from January 2001 to Jun 2001. Generally, people preferred to get information using email, telephone or contacting agency in person.

With regards, persons inquired using telephones, it initiated from 800 in January 2001 and then inclined drastically and reached its zenith point around 1100 in June 2001. At the beginning, clients who approached in person were less compared to people who gathered information using telephones but at the end of the period the information gathered by public through contacting them in person surpassed the people who contacted company using telephones.

However the way of obtaining knowledge through email went through many fluctuation. Moreover, mass who gained the information using electronic message or letter stood at around 600 before declining significantly to about 200 messages.

Overall, Contacting tourist corporate in person was the favored by the clients rather then communicating them through telephone are Electronic messages.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-24 tata 67 view
2024-09-24 tata 73 view
2024-09-24 tata 78 view
2024-09-24 tata 67 view
2024-09-24 tata 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... contacted company using telephones. However the way of obtaining knowledge through ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fluctuation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many fluctuations'.
Suggestion: many fluctuations
...ng knowledge through email went through many fluctuation. Moreover, mass who gained the informat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...n was the favored by the clients rather then communicating them through telephone ar...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79245283019 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91414264655 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62893081761 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6342594316 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.571428571 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0607868657977 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359225767753 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879919833455 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.046702749763 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808915354428 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.