SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT INTERNET HAS BROUGHT PEOPLE CLOSER TOGETHER WHILE OTHERS THINK THAT PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES ARE BECOME MORE ISOLATED. DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND GIVE OPINION.
Human relations, nowadays, have been significantly influenced by internet. It is perceived by one part of society that internet makes people’s relation stronger by bringing them close to each other; however, others consider that its impact on individuals make them remote and alone in the society. This essay will elucidate both perspectives along with presentation of my own opinion in the end.
On the one hand, people think that the internet brings people closer because of its various social websites. Owing to this, people can contact to their near and dear ones, who are living overseas, while sitting at their home and make their relations stronger. For instance, Mona, one of my bosom friends, talks to her parents not only on daily basis from Australia to India on Skype but also knows about their well-being easily. Besides this, youngsters make good links with others on various social applications: Face-book, Instagram and Snap chat, who are living in different parts of the country.
On the other hand, if people are having no contact with their surroundings and keep themselves busy with internet, then they become secluded. For example, children love to play online games, such as Pub G or Eightball poll, with other players on the internet and they do not want to interact with their neighborhood friends to play outdoor games. Therefore, in their free time, rather than intermingling with their friends and other family members, they prefer to remain occupied in their virtual world. Moreover, people do not prefer to go to their relative or friend houses as they talk to them on video calls. Consequently, their relations are becoming restrained and weaker.
To conclude, while people vary in their opinions, in my perspective, the internet is required for maintaining distant relationships, but not at the sake of breaking individual’s link with surroundings and making themselves isolated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | prabhleenpreet kaur | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-01 | irvanabdullah | 61 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT INTERNET HAS BROUGHT PEOPLE CLOSER TOGETHER WHILE OTHERS THINK THAT PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES ARE BECOME MORE ISOLATED. DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND GIVE OPINION. 84
- IN MANY COUNTRIES, VERY FEW YOUNG PEOPLE READ NEWSPAPERS OR FOLLOW THE NEWS ON TV. WHAT DO YOU THINK ARE THE CAUSES OF THIS? WHAT SOLUTIONS CAN YOU SUGGEST? 73
- TOO MANY OLD HISTORIC BUILDINGS ARE IN DANGER AND DESTROYED IN MANY COUNTRIES WHAT ARE THE MAIN REASON HOW TO PROTECT THEM 52
- SOME TEACHERS THINK THAT INTERNATIONAL STUDENT EXCHANGE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL FOR ALL TEENAGE SCHOOL STUDENTS. DO YOU THINK ITS ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH ITS DISADVANTAGES? 78
- IN GENERAL PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE SUCH A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS AS COMPARED TO THE PAST? WHY THIS IS SO? AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO IMPROVE THE CONTACT BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORS? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consider that its impact on individuals make them remote and alone in the societ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82273406947 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0595289224 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208185351423 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835443013371 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081552228948 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133826561195 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214778420971 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.