A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Our nation is a vast and varied one. Diverse regions house diverse individuals. Some argue that curriculum should be nationally mandated, but strict standardization will lead to the detriment of the individual.
Our nation is a vast and varied one. By forcing all students to study the same material, administrators would be stripping individual regions of their diversity. For example, schools in rural areas often have vocational-technical options that help prepare the students of that area for the jobs that will be available to them. High schools might offer agricultural courses to help children who grew up on a farm turn their home experience into a career. If that were mandated nationally, many people would find themselves wasting time in a class that had no use to them. If that were removed nationally, a small, but valid, portion of the population would be without a class that could help them attain a productive career.
This proposal also does not take into account the individual student. Each student has his or her own set of strengths and weaknesses. Is every student capable of succeeding in advanced Calculus? Surely not. By standardizing a curriculum, students would be punished. Either those who want to reach the upper levels would be forbidden to, or those who cannot achieve greatness in those classes would be subjected to failure. By preventing individuation, proponents of this idea are preventing students from reaching their full potential.
Although individuality is necessary, there should still be some standards. By setting a minimum standard, a national curriculum ensures that all its students are educated to a satisfactory level. By having standards, it is then possible to observe which schools are succeeding and which need additional supports. As with most things in life, maintaining a balance is imperative.
By mandating a national curriculum, there are many students who would fall through the cracks. Strong students would not be able to reach their full potential, and students who need more support would be forced to engage in classes they are not capable of understanding. If a national curriculum is to be adopted, it should allow room for individual regions and students, thereby ensuring the succcess of as many students as possible.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-10 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
2020-01-10 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
2019-12-29 | Shams Tarek | 62 | view |
2019-12-17 | ali.rs | 50 | view |
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 66
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 69
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 58
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25543478261 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04292988072 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4914570277 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9090909091 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.95454545455 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158769903472 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521315864289 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478966009595 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102631020227 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342600537141 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.