Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer?
Nowadays, the fact in the way that we learn it is very important. We have many differences resources that can permit to access to information for the student. In the school or universities, are different ways to learn o access to the information. Not only exist the libraries, but exist different instances that we can access and learn much better.
Firstly, it is very common nowadays the fact that it is a trend; in the university commonly, the way to learn talking the information, creating argues, and not only sending a homework and read a lot of pages from a book. For example, in the case of a class about moral, the best way to learn this topic it could be explain or describe some situation that permit a better knowledge, because “you live the information”. It can permit to create a critical thinking that works for some people.
In the other hand, we have people that do not like learning with discussions about some issues, and then, they prefer to read in a book about something. That situation it could occur in some context that you need to learn and read more about some complex issue. For example, if you need to describe or explain one topic that you need teach clearly, you should have been a complete knowledge about that topic, and then people could be understand much better.
Both points of view are good, because it has pro and cons. In my case I prefer a mix of both because I feel that learning and speaking about different topic, my knowledge it is much better. In fact, that it is the way I learn and works to me. In summary, the way that we learn depend of the preference from the people. There are many ways that we learn and we have the resources. Therefore, we need to choose what it is the best way that works for us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accessing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'permit' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accessing
...y differences resources that can permit to access to information for the student. In the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to talk'.
Suggestion: to talk
...e university commonly, the way to learn talking the information, creating argues, and n...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'permit' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: creating
...ve the information'. It can permit to create a critical thinking that works for some...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... it is the way I learn and works to me. In summary, the way that we learn depend o...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to depend'
Suggestion: to depend
...o me. In summary, the way that we learn depend of the preference from the people. Ther...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t it is the best way that works for us.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, for example, i feel, in fact, in summary, speaking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54161194696 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431677018634 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.900914591 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5625 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109243171319 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379139544814 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478927436113 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655686134425 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373822791633 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.