Youngtown wildlife
Youngtown Wildlife Preserver is going through a proposal about weather to give some part of land to Simth corporation or not. The authority is planning to not provide land for the corporation to build hotel in its premises; since the land is the home of 300 bird species. But it seems that the authority has reached to the conclusion of not letting the corporation to build hotel too quickly. The primary reason of this cause is that the research is not exhaustive and the premises are not sufficient. There are many fallacies that the conclusion is prone to. Some of them are - are arial animals affected by hotel construction on small land?, are there solutions that offset the problem like planting more trees?, what are the problems of birds that will lead to migration?, and more.
The authority assumes that construction of hotel will be a pest to birds but this may not be true because birds don't need a large space to their survival. We have seen birds have built their nest in the roof of homes and have taken shelters in temples from ancient times too. Since the area that corporation is taking is very small area of Youngtown Wildlife, it will have very negligible effect on the bird's habitat. Maybe authority should research about the endangered species that are living in the preserve and if they are affected by human construction or not. It will make the decision more rboust.
Maybe the authority should also research about if there are any solutions that will offset the problem caused by the construction. For example, planting abundant trees in the premises of hotel might solve the issue because birds will be able to build nest in the trees. Probably, the authority might also suggest the corporation to buld a hotel that is more natural and look like a part of forest. If that is the case, the birds will not notice there is a human construction. There are many hotels that are built with the resources found in forests and resembles like they are part of forest.
I strongly suggest the authority to research what are the consequences that preserve has to face due to construction. For example, why would birds tend to migrate to other places?, is it for forage?, or any other reason. If we can find the reason of this then we can easily solve those problems and the construction won't face any obstacles at all. The authority can take advise from the specialists and also research about the similar cases that took place in other parts of world and how they were able to solve the problem.
So without exhaustive research we cannot say that the construction will become harmful. Birds, being an aerial creatures will live most of their lives in air and trees. They are less affected by any of the construction that takes place in land. We can also analyse many offsetting solutions that will help to minimize the effects. We can finally conclude that, the research is not exhaustive and we cannot reach to the conclusion too early due to such weak reason.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | Saket Choudhary | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | Jorobe8 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-19 | Swarnali Swarno | 58 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | mausam | 30 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- Youngtown wildlife 59
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge andexperience to that field of study. 66
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whoseviews contradict our own. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 524 350
No. of Characters: 2412 1500
No. of Different Words: 215 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.784 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.603 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.436 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 135 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.96 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.803 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.52 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.286 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.482 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... but this may not be true because birds dont need a large space to their survival. W...
^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...will have very negligible effect on the birds habitat. Maybe authority should researc...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 112, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'creature'?
Suggestion: creature
... become harmful. Birds, being an aerial creatures will live most of their lives in air an...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, may, so, then, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.6327345309 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.9520958084 185% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 28.8173652695 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 55.5748502994 122% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2476.0 2260.96107784 110% => OK
No of words: 522.0 441.139720559 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74329501916 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50971300637 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 204.123752495 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421455938697 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 763.2 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3676947444 57.8364921388 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.04 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.88 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52 5.70786347227 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0458316148237 0.218282227539 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0144880140879 0.0743258471296 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550386219075 0.0701772020484 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.026556806222 0.128457276422 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369867541662 0.0628817314937 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.32208582834 85% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.