Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Choosing fields of study is an extremely important process in every student’s life. Irrespective of what they choose, almost every student comes across this crossroad at least once in their life. It would have been so much simpler if it would have been just a crossroad and not a plethora of diverse fields to choose from. Educational institutions have a definite role and responsibility to play and carry out in this decision-making process as it is the institution who is supposed to be the best counsel to the student. The student can get all the various kinds of information from them, and thus make a better decision when it comes to choosing a field of study. It is the duty of educational institutions to encourage students to undertake a field of study that has lucrative jobs and opportunities, as it promotes the welfare of the student and ensures the overall advancement of the nation.
Choosing a field of study that has great career opportunities is crucial for the realisation of many goals that students have that they want to fulfil in the future. It is one of the most stable ways of actually realising those aspirational future goals and objectives. Any field of study demands a great deal of effort on the student’s part for quite some years. It is only fair that after putting in so much hard work, the student be rewarded with a lucrative job that offers great salaries and good benefits. Educational institutions, should therefore make it their duty to inform students and make them aware about the advantages of different fields of study that offers them great opportunities, which are not only measured by monetary gain but also measured in terms of growth potential.
In addition, professionals in lucrative careers often get more respect in society. As important as it might be to achieve and realise future goals in the monetary sense, it is equally important to be a respectable member of the society. For example, most people consider medicine as one of the most noble professions, and doctors, in general, get a lot more respect from society than engineers do, although they might be equally lucrative in terms of monetary gain and growth opportunities. We all, as human beings, crave for respect. And what better way to be respected, than to be involved in a respectable profession.
However, not all decisions should be made based solely on the possibilities of earning money or respect. It is equally important to take into consideration, the interest of a student while choosing their prospective field of study. If there is an absence of interest of a student in pursuing any particular field of study, they should not be forced to take that up, however lucrative the opportunities it promises. The lack of interest inculcates a negative feeling and reluctance towards the educational path that needs to be followed to be successful in that field. The potential of growth also decreases with the decrease in interest.
As educational institutions, it should be their duty to inform their students of the various opportunities, that different fields promise, and make them aware of various parameters that are necessary to reach a discerning judgement. I would like to sum up by stating that although it is important for schools and colleges to encourage and guide students to take up promising fields of study, they should never be forced to do the same, if they are not interested in pursuing it, or they find themselves weak in those areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | z.salahshoor | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | kook | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | jessie_llj | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | ko_tik | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | dvtien95 | 50 | view |
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 66
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 66
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...t would have been so much simpler if it would have been just a crossroad and not a plethora of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, in addition, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2924.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 587.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98126064736 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9222030514 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97219942024 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437819420784 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 929.7 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.411049001 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.130434783 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5217391304 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227985470498 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709881815924 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519034938697 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134611700281 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618564359168 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.