A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
For a nation to be succesful, a national identity needs to be defined. This identity can be inculcated succesfuly only in the formative years of a person. Therefore, having a standard national curriculum will be beneficial at school level.
It can also be argued that, individual cultures that are not closely related but are still a subset of the same nation might be difficult to incorporate in the same curriculum. This might lead to losing of the finer parts of a culture and lead to a student having only superficial knowledge of said culture. For example, let us look at India; the country has more than twenty nationally recognized languages, more than hundred dialects of said languages and can be decribed as an amalgamation of various relegions, races, cultures etc. It is not possible to define a single curriculum that can sufficiently appease the beautiful charecterstics of each of these differing sects. It is said that having partial knowledge on a subject is more dangerous than ignorance.
But, if we ignore languages and social sciences just for a moment, then this idea surely makes sense. Why should a person studying maths and science in different parts of the country have differing syllabus? Subject that deal with hard facts and based on scientific reasoning can be easily subjected to a uniform curriculum. The standardized curriculum will also help colleges for admitting students since they will be able to judge students uniformely based on their performance. This is a major issue for universities during admissions since it is quite difficult to judge two students who have a similar profile and the only parameter based on which they can be segregated is their schooling performance. Having different syllabus means that the scoring criteria also changes and the difficulty of the curriculum also needs to be taken into account which can be a painstaking process. A common curricullum also places each of the students on a uniform pedestal before they begin their college. This ensures that no single student is beginning at a disadvantage.
The issue of social sciences and languages can also be solved by offering a specialization in each subject with respect to the varying criteria be it language, relegion, food culture or something else. This will lead to student being more involved and well versed in their studies since they will choose subjects that truly interest them instead of mugging up facts which they will end up forgetting anyway. Another advantage of common syllabus is that it allows students themselves to introspect on their position amongst their peers which can lead to an early self realization of their strengths and weaknesses.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 65
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 54
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ionally recognized languages, more than hundred dialects of said languages and can be d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, if, look, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14318181818 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85975115227 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504545454545 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.33415281 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.105263158 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169989111717 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594114455993 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529916848112 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111786112781 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299120465242 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.