"Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with the station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, several local businesses that used to run advertisements during our late-night news program have just cancelled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand the coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs."
The memorandum published by the business manager of a television station states the conclusion that the increase in viewers can be facilitated by retaining the former time of weather and local news in their late news program. Since the conclusion laid by the manager is based on the arguments and facts which are further laid upon some unanswered questions, nothing can be concluded without proper consideration and scrutinization of arguments.
Firstly, the manager states that the complaints received by the viewers were concerned with the station's coverage of weather and local news but no survey statistics or report information is provided by the manager. Thus, no credence can be laid upon the fact established by the manager that the complaints were of that subject. Another important contingency to be taken into consideration is that there is no mention of the type of complaints launched by the viewers. It is possible that the viewers did not complain for the less time devoted to weather and local news but they complained because of the degraded quality of that news.
Secondly, the point that is laid by the manager on the fact that the advertising companies have canceled their contracts with them has a loophole in it. It is possible that the contractors refused to advertise their news because they did not provide relevant content which led to a decrease in viewers and ultimately proved to be a loss for those advertising companies. Simply considering the fact that the advertising companies declined to make a contract because of a decrease in time devoted to weather and local news is spurious. Also, there is a possibility that those advertising companies have started collaborating with other television stations who provide better content on a low cost.
Lastly, the conclusion states that to increase more viewers and to avoid further loss in advertising can be compensated by restoring the former times devoted to weather and local news. This fact can be strengthened by reaching to the users and then drawing out the bigger picture of what needs to be improved. Simply assuming that they are unhappy with the less time is fallacious. Carrying out surveys and reports based on viewers expectations can help in figuring out the relevant solution.
To reach to the clinch. the television station company should figure out whether or not the content provided by them to the advertising companies is at par the level with other television station companies. Also, the mere consideration of the fact that profit in revenue by attracting more users is also untrue. Improving content and including some other type of informative content can lure the viewers to watch the late-night news.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | tomlee0205 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | yirtusemla | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | riyarmy | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | aryaman | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | searchinglife06 | 66 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerne 67
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based o 42
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 444 350
No. of Characters: 2235 1500
No. of Different Words: 183 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.59 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.034 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.817 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 164 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 145 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 90 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.118 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.194 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.471 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.357 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.593 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.1 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stations'' or 'station's'?
Suggestion: stations'; station's
... by the viewers were concerned with the stations coverage of weather and local news but ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 25, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... solution. To reach to the clinch. the television station company should figur...
^^^
Line 17, column 74, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ision station company should figure out whether or not the content provided by them to the adv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 55.5748502994 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2283.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 444.0 441.139720559 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14189189189 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85204775664 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416666666667 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0128391157 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 23.324526521 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.70786347227 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250746660969 0.218282227539 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904350908298 0.0743258471296 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104491744628 0.0701772020484 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155752832851 0.128457276422 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678673392262 0.0628817314937 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.