Some people say that Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. others think access to much information creates problems. Which one do you agree with?
By and large, with the advent of Internet people's ways of living have revolutionized appreciably. Thanks to its rapid growth which provides prevalent accessibility to a massive range of information for all the people in all over the world. Nowadays Internet affords not only invaluable information but also a colossal range of successful business. A long-lasting and controversial question regarding this issue which has always caused drastic contention among academicians is that the considerable range of Internet-based information is reliable or not. The majority of people contend that there is no doubt in the reliability of Internet-based information, while others believe that a significant amount of information is incorrect and they bring some major problems. I admit that both of them have simultaneously advantages and disadvantages, so I believe that the issue needs to clarify using bilateral analyses. In the following, I will aptly elaborate on my perspective using two substantial and compelling reasons.
No one can deny the significant influence of academicians on the wide range of provided information on Internet. As a matter of fact, everyone who has an academic education can access to internet and create his/her own website in order to provide useful information in their fields of study. Therefore, this capability allows Internet to give users the myriad range of information in all the fields. Internet is more and more valuable, especially for students to acquire correct information for their research projects. Take a personal experience as an example to enlighten this perspective much better. When I was a freshman, I had been working to complete my paper for more than one year. The procedure of the project had been already stopped because of the fact that I could have not found appropriate information related to my paper. After that, I had attended to my supervisor who had told me to find suitable Internet-based information. Only after one click had I found quite a lot of useful materials. My personal experience demonstrates that I would not have finished my paper had other people not provided the authentic information in their websites.
Another indisputable cause that convinces me to hold the other possibility that implies some people are concerned about the problems that they might have faced when they use the Internet-based information is substantiated in the following. It is an undeniable fact that, although the information is provided mostly by educated persons, there is much inauthentic information on internet which is readily accessible. One of the well-known websites is Wikipedia that is usable and editable by all the users. Recently, I have heard that some users write incorrect information in Wikipedia or in their own websites intentionally for some mysterious political reasons. This occurs because there is no strong policy to prevent people from doing that. Existing of incorrect information on internet that are used by people, especially students and professors, leads to encounter noticeable problems. I personally have had a similar situation. During one of my jobs, I had needed some basic information about the working mechanisms of the transistors in order to present for more than one hundred audiences. I had checked Wikipedia and I got a lot of information. Unfortunately, there was incorrect information in my presentation, for that mistake our company missed the chance of extending its products to other fields and the situation got worst and I had no choice but to resign. Now, when I look back, I realize that the company has experienced an irreversible cost because of that incorrect information. This example demonstrates that in some cases the Internet and its information can lead to a big disaster. It is an empirical solution that to prevent such a problem before use of the Internet-based information makes certain about the correctness of information by validating it using other reliable sources of information like books, and papers, etc.
Taking all the aforementioned reasons, and examples into account, I conclude that Internet is a valuable source of information that is provided by educated peoples and it also sometimes brings problems because some people put inauthentic information in their websites. I highly recommend that the reported reasons should be taken as additional information to be considered by one whose concern is related to this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-03 | bahram1993 | 73 | view |
- What are some important qualities of a good supervisor (boss)? Use specific details and examples to explain why these qualities are important. 73
- Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader 70
- the clay jars which had been discovered in Iraq have nothing to do with producing electricity 80
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 76
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...of the project had been already stopped because of the fact that I could have not found appropriate info...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, while, no doubt, as a matter of fact, by and large, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 33.0 11.0286738351 299% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 78.0 43.0788530466 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 38.0 8.0752688172 471% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3759.0 1977.66487455 190% => OK
No of words: 704.0 407.700716846 173% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33948863636 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.1510191538 4.48103885553 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20240618824 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 320.0 212.727598566 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1231.2 618.680645161 199% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0442678687 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.46875 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320670966117 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815113994525 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558144106778 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21184823433 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290400107174 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 175.0 86.8835125448 201% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.