A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education provides students with the vital tools and skills needed to achieve success in higher education, and in an occupational setting. Because of this, a nation should require all students to study the same curriculum until entering college.
Studying the same curriculum nationally provides the ideal opportunity for consistency. Today, students entering college all vary immensely in their educational backgrounds. Choose two incoming students, and the discrepancies in their previous curriculums are noticed immediately. One freshman has taken upper calculus classes, while the other barely received any instruction covering the basics of college algebra. Giving students the exact same plan of study before college allows each individual to feel confident that they a solid foundation to build on entering college. Furthermore, an adopted national curriculum promotes fairness in access to resources. Students living in rural areas have the same resources and training available to them as the schools in metropolitan locations do; all students will have the same base of knowledge, skillsets, and resources as a result of a national curriculum. Uniformity in the curriculum allows all students to receive the education necessary to be successful in college <i>and</i> in the occupational world.
However, uniform curriculums nationally can hinder creativity in the educational realm. All students being judged on the equal standards set by the adopted curriculum diminishes the importance of individuality. For example, college applicants will all be judged, essentially, on who is the most intelligent. Students will be hindered in their abilities to show creativity and uniqueness, giving them little opportunities to set themselves apart in ways other than academic achievement. In addition, teachers will be limited in their ability to alter the curriculum to fit the specific needs of students in their classroom. Each teacher has to stick unwaveringly to the curriculum given, leaving them little room to provide extra learning opportunities or add their own personalization to a subject. Although there are downfalls of a national curriculum, the benefits of consistency entering college and the equal access to resources for all students outweigh the potential cons. Ultimately, the opportunity for consistency in the education system is necessary and is best provided by a national curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- Essay topics: The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones."In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway wi 50
- Essay topics: The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones."In order to relieve Briggsville’s notorious traffic congestion, Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi-million dollar subway system. The subway wi 63
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 16
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.“According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 30
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74651810585 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17434373187 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532033426184 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4512952336 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.611111111 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430648582708 0.243740707755 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149780932596 0.0831039109588 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161126881346 0.0758088955206 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342854432216 0.150359130593 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103089600457 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.1639044944 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.