The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:
"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004, development along the coastal wetlands has been prohibited. Now local development interests are lobbying for the West Lansburg council to allow an access road to be built along the edge of wetlands. Neighboring Eastern Carpenteria, which had a similar sanctuary, has seen its sea otter population decline since the repeal of its sanctuary status in 1978. In order to preserve the region's biodiversity and ensure a healthy environment, the West Lansburg council should not allow the road to be built."
The argument failds to develop a strong connection between the declining population of sea otter of the Carpenteria to that of groudhogs living in Lansburg. While this might be true, nonetheless, the support given in this passage fails to account for the supposed decline in groundhogs' population. The argument is based on many unstated assumptions.
Firsty, the argument assumes that the development of road along the coastal wetlands and the consequent human activity is going to kill the groundhogs. This claim lacks the necessary evidence to support the plummet of gorundhogs polulation. This claim could have been strengthened had the author mentioned the evidence of how construction of a road is going to have any affect. The author states that construction might decrease biodiversity and make the environment worse for the groundhogs. There's is no way a road can result in above mentioned consequences. Had the author mentioned that the road is going to be used a lot for travelling, and the pollution from the cars has been scientifically proven to kill the groundhogs, the argument could have been substantiated.
Secondly, the auther applies the situation of otters to grounhogs and draws conclusions. It might be the case that otter perished mainly because of a disease or the food they feed on got less. Ii might also be possible that thepopulation of animal that preys on otter
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | sandeshbhandari2 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | Adebayo | 63 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | banu.abdikadirova | 63 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | Ramzah Rehman | 16 | view |
| 2018-09-16 | dhruvsawhney | 24 | view |
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 66
- “The best way to teach is to praise positiveactions and ignore negative ones.” Write a response in which you discuss theextent to which you agree or disagree with therecommendation and explain your reasoningfor the position you take. In developing and 16
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wi 16
- "Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a 500-page report in only two hours; another graduate rose f 63
- “The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.” Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
...e environment worse for the groundhogs. Theres is no way a road can result in above me...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 2260.96107784 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 227.0 441.139720559 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18061674009 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03380015995 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 204.123752495 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546255506608 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 705.55239521 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7253899036 57.8364921388 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 23.324526521 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.70786347227 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0608796958798 0.218282227539 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0204818019708 0.0743258471296 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250184639735 0.0701772020484 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0420790929406 0.128457276422 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307988685759 0.0628817314937 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 98.500998004 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.