TPO 28
Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celebrity. Though some historians have expressed doubts that Peary did in fact reach the North Pole, three arguments provide strong support for the truth of Peary's claim. First, the National Geographic Society put together a committee that was instructed to conduct a thorough investigation of Peary's records and equipment. At the end of the investigation, the committee concluded that Peary's accounts were consistent and persuasive and declared that he had indeed reached the North Pole. Second, a recent expedition provides support for Peary's claim that he reached the North Pole in only 37 days after setting out from Ellesmere Island off the coast of Greenland. Skeptics used to argue that Peary could not have traveled that fast, since even modern snowmobiles take longer to cover the same distance. However, a British explorer named Tom Avery recently made the same trek in less than 37 days. In fact, Avery used the same kind of dogsled and the same number and breed of dogs as Peary had. Thus, Peary's claims are not impossible, and he very well might have been telling the truth. Third, there are photographs taken by Peary that support his claim to have reached the North Pole. Measuring the shadows in Peary's photographs makes it possible to calculate the Surf s position in the sun. The Surf s position established from the photographs corresponds exactly to the Surf s position as it should have been at the North Pole on that day. This provides strong evidence that Peary reached the North Pole and took the photographs there.
The reading claims that some science expressed doubt on peary reaching to the north pole. The author elaborates his viewpoints by providing three main reasons. Nevertheless, the professor believes that these concepts are not solid evidence and are not convincing; so refutes each of the author's stand-point.
First, the reading asserts that National Geographical Society investigate considerably on the trustworhty of this record; hence, assumed and declared that he had indeed reached the north pole. However, the professor refutes this idea by stating that it's not true since it have complete objection. In additional, she mentioned abou Pear's friends as the foundation of the trip as important reason that investigator could get wrong information by his friends.
Furthermore, the article posits that recent expedition support of peary's claim since tom Avery made the same trek in less than 37 days ann shows that it can be correct. On the other hand, the lecturer bings up the fact that tom's trek is actually differ from Pear's since he had less food and weight which made it possible to reached in less than 37 days. also she states that favorable condition of the wethear as another factor of the perfect record and illustrates that they are diffrenet at all.
Finally, the article avers from photographs which taken in the pole as another support because it's possible to establish position of Pear;s by estimating and measuring his shadow on the picture. Contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this concept by stating that mentioned technology require percise shadow in the picture but it was about 100 years ago and photo wasn't percise and was fussy and unfocosed;hence, it not proves anythings. she also states that picture is blure and doesn't have a great accuracy to percise measuring of the shadow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | Ashfaq | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | aliola_214 | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | bishoy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Seema Modak | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | alta | 60 | view |
- TPO 28-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO 30 Integrated WritingA little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper 90
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 90
- TOEFL T P O 46 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO29 -To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... abou Pears friends as the foundation of the trip as important reason that invest...
^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ssible to reached in less than 37 days. also she states that favorable condition of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: also,
...ssible to reached in less than 37 days. also she states that favorable condition of ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ut it was about 100 years ago and photo wasnt percise and was fussy and unfocosed;hen...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 437, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...focosed;hence, it not proves anythings. she also states that picture is blure and d...
^^^
Line 7, column 479, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e also states that picture is blure and doesnt have a great accuracy to percise measur...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13175675676 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69067424702 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591216216216 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.186198462 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.583333333 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347036490852 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114142196296 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115187902622 0.0662205650399 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183237285742 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454140535128 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.