Which one do you prefer? Why? 1) a company offering you a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days or 2) another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but has more vacation days.
In the modern era, each individual's job plays a prominent role in his life. Jobs are supposed to pacify various needs and increase life satisfaction among people. There has been a long debate about traits of a good job but this term has been vague for a long time. The controversial question which arises here is whether it is more beneficial to have a challenging job with less vacation days or it is more convenient to have a boring job which offers you more holidays. Although the second choice might seem tempting, I would definitely prefer to have an interesting job with less vacation days. In what follows, two elaborate reasons will vindicate my standpoint.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that having a demanding job gives me a great sense of self-efficacy. If I face various perplexing problems in my job and I can thrive to solve them, I will believe that I am beneficial for my company. This notion can have many fruitful effects. Self-confidence is noticeably affected by self-efficacy. On the other hand, the boring job will fail to satisfy my needs. If I am given a rudimentary task to do, I can easily lose my motivation and leave the job. According to a famous motivation theory, two types of motivations exist. The first group which are called motivators can increase satisfaction, however, the second group which are known as Hygienes can only decrease discontent. Having extended period of vacation is a Hygiene which cannot eradicate the detrimental effects of having an interesting job. To be more precise, not only can durable vacations not compensate for lack of need for innovation in a job, but also all the other factors will fail to carry out this task.
The second noteworthy reason is that since I am an extroverted person with a great sense of competition, having a challenging job is an indispensable part of my life. I like to compete with other companies in producing new products and thing about ingenious ways of solving a problem twenty-four seven. Moreover, I have a great tendency to work with other people and discuss my opinions. Also, I do believe that this strategy can help me to cultivate my knowledge in order to get promotion. For instance, I used to work in a company for two years and I was a member of an adroit team. Our main responsibility was to develop a software program for the first time. Although this task seemed tormenting, I really enjoyed working with other people and being able to state my opinion in group discussions. Also, these discussions gave the chance to cultivate my knowledge and come up with more sophisticated ideas every time.
To bring everything into conclusion, however it might seem preposterous, I like to have a more challenging vocation even if it has less off-days. This job can provide with great motivation. Moreover, challenging jobs give me the opportunity to make a team and cultivate my knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | Mahimoon | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | r.mahdavi70@gmail.com | 70 | view |
- If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?1. riding bicycle or walking on foot2. recycling the waste3. buying local organic food 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific arguments presented in the reading passage 3
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 73
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, as to, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2409.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82765531062 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93167126514 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51503006012 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9041375304 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2222222222 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4814814815 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266170373905 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657660680596 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078756082275 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17891857929 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971428224744 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.