some people think that the development of technology help to decrease crime and other people think that would encourage crime to discuss both views and give your opinion
Evaluation of technology is happening rapidly but some people thinks that, this is the key to change and help crime department whereas some might think that, this can be a potential threat if someone used in wrong way.
Firstly, There are several advantages about improvement in technology, This will help to solve critical problems quickly. Like face recognition which will help police to find criminal very efficiently because nowadays there are several cameras in public. Then phone tracking is also the main aspect to track someone with exact location. Colossal database of criminal will help to see history of them and with help of artificial intelligence, system can identify behavior of criminal. In future, AI will help to recognize detrimental behavior beforehand only using modern algorithm and public cameras.
Moreover, There are some downside of this evaluation of technology. Criminals are prudent, sometime they know how to handle this latest technology. Criminals can misuse these technology to commit crime. Like black-hat hacker which are unprofessional and unethical, they can use these software, hack it and demands money in digital currency like bitcoins. This can be a major threat to any company because it is about data. Data is major aspect of this technology and if someone hack it then it will be troublesome to retrieve it.
In a nutshell, There are lot of pros and cons about development of technology in crime. But there are more advantages only because as technology evolve, security also change and gets stringent with it. There might be chance that geeky criminals misused it, but this will also get resolved by using technology only.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 50
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 50
- some people think that the development of technology help to decrease crime and other people think that would encourage crime to discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...stem can identify behavior of criminal. In future, AI will help to recognize detrimental ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 26, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'downsides'?
Suggestion: downsides
... cameras. Moreover, There are some downside of this evaluation of technology. Crimi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
...latest technology. Criminals can misuse these technology to commit crime. Like black-hat hacker ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 279, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this software' or 'these softwares'?
Suggestion: this software; these softwares
...rofessional and unethical, they can use these software, hack it and demands money in digital c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t resolved by using technology only.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26765799257 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71395324425 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550185873606 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3947191268 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154243782511 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536806018923 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707386740692 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114020974683 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845978915187 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.