Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Humans are a part of an ecosystem which also includes the other wildlife and in the absence of one or the other, the balance is disturbed. Prompt proposes a policy to preserve any remaining areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gains. I strongly agree with the proposed policy as it is important for both mankind and the planet on which we reside, for the following three reasons.
Firstly, the current generation has witnessed the extinction of many species of animals and plants because of our selfish desire to make get the advantage of the other resources available to us at the cost of other wildlife. A few years ago, white elephants of Africa were eye-pleasing animals to look at now they can only be found at the museum. If we don't stop exploiting the wildlife and its resources then it's not long enough when we must take our next generation to the museum to show them the extinct species, which could have been present in their natural habitat without human intervention.
Secondly, the economic gains at the cost of wildlife don't seem like a good gamble as nations tourism will be adversely affected by the disappearance of wildlife from the country. We can see that nation like Bhutan which is a famous tourist hotspot for their evergreen forests and wildlife and tourism is one of the major sources of income of Bhutan. If a country like Bhutan can boost its economy with the help of wildlife, then it doesn't seem advisable to look for other source income to boost the country’s economy at the cost of the tourism industry which is heavily dependent on wildlife preservation.
Lastly, nature tends to return the humans their favour both good and bad. If humans destroy wild for their own good and profit, then in the absence of the wildlife the balance in the ecosystem is disturbed and it leads to a major issue. Like, in the absence of vast green forest the wildlife will find its way into the human establishments. Every day, we read news about the wild animals like lions and tigers entering the villages for food where they tend to attack humans and their cattle leading to loss of lives.
People may say that economic growth is good for the nation and should be prioritized over the wildlife as they don't see the benefits of having the proper balance. But one should not forget that wildlife boosts tourism and helps maintains the balance in the ecosystem. Thus, based on the above points we can say that it's good to have the policy to conserve the wildlife as such without looking for economic gain by destroying them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 75
- "A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. We have always advertised our use of the End 78
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had litt 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... can only be found at the museum. If we dont stop exploiting the wildlife and its re...
^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... economic gains at the cost of wildlife dont seem like a good gamble as nations tour...
^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nomy with the help of wildlife, then it doesnt seem advisable to look for other source...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e prioritized over the wildlife as they dont see the benefits of having the proper b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73127753304 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45183076932 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7870072785 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.25 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213963356215 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836281770508 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115667892036 0.0758088955206 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136298033958 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108857503878 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.