Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position
The title suggests that government should focus on solving problems at hand rather than the anticipated problems of the future. Undoubtedly, the main focus should always be on the most pressing current problems but this statement emphasizes on this a lot. Hence this narrow generalization has make this statement unsupportive.
Indisputably, governments of all the countries give their main focus on the most burdening problems that requires immediate actions. There is no alternative to this in fact. For example, recently in our country, Dengue fever has become an epidemic and it is taking a lot of lives. Hence government has taken various steps immediately to prevent this like spreading mosquito killing spray, creating awareness among people and decreasing the treatment cost. All these steps tremendously improved the overall condition. Furthermore, soil erosion due to flooding is another recent problem in some parts of our country. Government also taken immediate steps to relocate the people of those areas. Hence there is no denying the fact that government should always response immediately to the current issues for the keeping balance in the country.
However, that does not necessarily mean that government should only remain busy with the immediate problems and should not anticipate which problems may come in future. In fact, if the future problems can be identified early, proper steps can be taken before and thus much casualties can be avoided. This type of visionary plan should be taken by all governments. For example, if the ruling party of our country could estimate the recrudesce of Dengue fever earlier by collecting data from various source, this problem would not be epidemic like this. In fact, there is an old saying that - prevention is better than cure. Actually, our neighboring countries took precautionary steps and thus were able to avoid the death of people. On the other hand, the government should identify the areas which will be vulnerable during floods and construct dams to secure that area. Thus measuring the problems earlier can save a lot of problems which can be very cumbersome to solve later.
Another example can be given against the statement. Suppose a government only rely on solving the current problems and do not try to anticipate what may trouble in future. So they can have no idea and preparation what they will face tomorrow. In present situation, the global economy fluctuates quite rapidly. Moreover, the occurrence of major climatic incidents can cause a huge damage within a few minutes. There can be sudden attack from other countries and so many more. So without being prepared for the problems earlier, it will be difficult to address all of them if they occur at once. Hence it will be unwise for a government to focus only on recent issues rather than the anticipated future problems.
In fine, the government should always be vigilant against all sorts of odds that may happen now or in future. Hence for this reason, I cannot fully agree with the statement.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
2019-11-27 | mohan41 | 50 | view |
2019-11-26 | louisetse | 66 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework, whereas in the district of Marlee, most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no 29
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...roblems of the future. Undoubtedly, the main focus should always be on the most pressing c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...his statement emphasizes on this a lot. Hence this narrow generalization has make thi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...rnments of all the countries give their main focus on the most burdening problems that req...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...idemic and it is taking a lot of lives. Hence government has taken various steps imme...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 693, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... to relocate the people of those areas. Hence there is no denying the fact that gover...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... not anticipate which problems may come in future. In fact, if the future problems can be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...oper steps can be taken before and thus much casualties can be avoided. This type of...
^^^^
Line 9, column 428, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ing party of our country could estimate the recrudesce of Dengue fever earlier by collecting d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 162, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... not try to anticipate what may trouble in future. So they can have no idea and preparati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 374, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge damage'.
Suggestion: huge damage
...e of major climatic incidents can cause a huge damage within a few minutes. There can be sudd...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 595, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ress all of them if they occur at once. Hence it will be unwise for a government to f...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 100, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ll sorts of odds that may happen now or in future. Hence for this reason, I cannot fully ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 111, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... odds that may happen now or in future. Hence for this reason, I cannot fully agree w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2562.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16532258065 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69023490066 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502016129032 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8450435938 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3448275862 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1034482759 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06896551724 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256656480091 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726570742516 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957831043162 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154690323851 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053707218965 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.