Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
There is a propensity of people to give judgement. No matter if they are related to the field or not . If they listen to some topic they are bound to give some of their judgement albeit abstruse or not. The world nowadays is an expert seeker. From house-making to health issues, people are going up to an expert for efficient use of their money and time. Critical judgement in any given field is no exception . I completely agree with the authors claim about the reliability of the judgement should only be given value of an expert.
Firstly, the judgement is an paramount critearia for the evaluation of the work or studies going on. Critical judgement- the one which guides to the betterment of the work and proper analysis regarding the extent of relevancy of the particular subject should only come from the experts itself who are the luminaries in that field and can essentially help to improve the conditions of the work and make it a very fruitful one. The opposite view of the author's claim might contend on the fact that one need not have to be an expert to give critical judgement. Even a perfunctory knowledge in any field will be enough to dissect the work of any given field and critically evaluate it.Take for instance:- The judge in supreme court might not have the knowledge regarding every fields like :- engineering,agriculture,land tenure but he is able to critically evaluate and give judgement based on that.
Secondly, the judgement provided by the one with cursory knowledge have a high chance of being filled with errors as he does not have any experience of the field and don"t know the circumstances regarding it. For a small example to yell at a Television when Messi or Ronaldo misses a penalty and suggesting even I would have scored that , further going on to tell he should have hit it with conviction to the top right corner and so and so would not have considered the pressure of carrying a nation or a team in a world tournament. The expectation, circumstances, opposition keeper should all have been taken into account by the pundits of that field. Hence the reliability of the judgement is more.
On the contrary, if u see a ditch in a road which has just been pitched a few day back or if there is an obvious clear error or as u might say a blunder , one need not have to be a expert to criticize such works and such critical evaluation should have a certain amount of value . The availability of the experts to examine your work might be the another factor pursuading the antagonists of the author's claim. The cost factor also come into account as the critical judgement by an expert is a tad expensive and cant be afforded by all the people. For a perfect example :- If a farmer wants to know the reason behind the yield loss of his farm, he needs to seek an expert in many fields of agronomy,horticulture,economist, plant pathologist etc which is way out of his budget and he goes with the common interpretation of a disease and insect and does the action accordingly.
To sum it all up, experts of the field know every bit of details regarding the limitations, scope of the field and can eventually give a critical judgement which will help to ultimately reach the goal of the work but an cursory judgement may be a foolish and an absurd viewpoint which has no such importance.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 60
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 66
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the projec 3
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework, whereas in the district of Marlee, most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... if they are related to the field or not . If they listen to some topic they are b...
^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ement in any given field is no exception . I completely agree with the authors cla...
^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... an expert. Firstly, the judgement is an paramount critearia for the evaluation ...
^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proper analysis regarding the extent of relevancy of the particular subject shou...
^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'perfunctory knowledge'.
Suggestion: perfunctory knowledge
...xpert to give critical judgement. Even a perfunctory knowledge in any field will be enough to dissect ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Take
... given field and critically evaluate it.Take for instance:- The judge in supreme cou...
^^^^
Line 3, column 802, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , agriculture
...garding every fields like :- engineering,agriculture,land tenure but he is able to criticall...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...suggesting even I would have scored that , further going on to tell he should have...
^^
Line 5, column 659, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...o account by the pundits of that field. Hence the reliability of the judgement is mor...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... clear error or as u might say a blunder , one need not have to be a expert to cri...
^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...say a blunder , one need not have to be a expert to criticize such works and such...
^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...on should have a certain amount of value . The availability of the experts to exam...
^^
Line 7, column 513, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ent by an expert is a tad expensive and cant be afforded by all the people. For a pe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 699, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , horticulture
...eek an expert in many fields of agronomy,horticulture,economist, plant pathologist etc which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to ultimately reach the goal of the work but an cursory judgement may be a foolis...
^^
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...imately reach the goal of the work but an cursory judgement may be a foolish and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2739.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 589.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65025466893 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92639038232 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02895430946 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449915110357 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 877.5 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.149381706 60.3974514979 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.95 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.45 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 7.80617977528 205% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320497689607 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107896776029 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799015804083 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198962336443 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841392920369 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.