quality of being a good government leader
By and large, the leader is a person who guides a group of people. When it comes to the definition of a leader in government, the meaning of leader is associated with the different factors. Based on my opinion, the leader of a country should become qualified in two ways which I will explain in the next paragraphs.
First, government leaders should prioritize their responsibility based on whatever has a direct effect on welfare in society rather than international and political interaction. Welfare is aimed at the everyday life of people and measured by the economy of a country. A wise leader should have enough knowledge in economics and make an appropriate decision resulting well-being and welfare for people. On the other hand, a poor decision-maker in the field of economics brings about the collapse of a county. In fact, the society members should be satisfied with their living situation. Otherwise, the discontented people will rebel and give rise to the collapse of the mentioned government. That is why ideologists have proved that a literate leader in economics is superiors to an educated leader in politics. Meanwhile, a country with a wise leader who cares about the living circumstances of society members takes precedence over a leader that just thinks about the political relationship of a country. In sum, a country whose leadership has made a concerted effort in order to enhance the financial quality of life of individuals can be considered as a good leader.
Second, a qualified leader should be a good decision-maker in a crisis. Occasionally, a natural disaster like an earthquake or flood may happen in a country. Moreover, under this tough situation, just an aware and smart leader can provide a situation in which seldom do people get hurt mentally and physically. For instance, in a huge hurricane last summer in a country, some people in a remote ruler were not aware of this catastrophic hurricane, whereas, the flood had been progressing every second. Their leadership forgot those people and just gave a command in order to help people near the beach. Owing to the inability of the leader in making an on-time decision in an urgent situation, five hundred innocent families passed away because of the hurricane. Had leaders been able to make a decision at the correct time, countries would never have destroyed, and members of societies would have been safe.
In conclusion, a qualified leader not only can enhance welfare among people in a society, but also should be a quick decision-maker on the exact moment which people need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | meet96301 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | PreetiKayastha | 81 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | hapsh | 83 | view |
| 2023-05-15 | Umme Abiha | 73 | view |
- What are advantages and disadvantages of storing information in electronic devices? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 76
- advantages and disadvantages of free health care 85
- space exploration advantages 3
- rights of animal 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06088992974 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94800430728 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0810376014 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.05 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29138802694 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854270386502 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848474058864 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168937754459 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723762507364 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.