Rembrandt painting
Both the passage and the lecture discuss a painting that was attributed to a Dutch painter, -Rembrandt. The reading states that there are few details that make them believe this painting did not belong to this artist. In contrast, the lecturer finds those unacceptable, citing three reasons to reject the points in the reading.
The passage and the lecture first discuss the clothing in the painting. The author argues that although the style of the painting and the painted picture which appeared in this artist’s other works make researchers believe that the painting belongs to Rembrandt, this artist is famous for focusing on details but the clothes are inconsistent due to the fact that the painting looks like a servant but the clothes are a mix of luxury and normal. The professor, on the other hand, illustrates that the luxurious item was added a hundred years later in order to make the painting look formal.
Next, the passage and the lecture discuss lighting in the painting. The passage mentions that Rembrandt was a master of light and shadow in the paintings, with this in mind there are some errors in the painting that could have not to be done by this Artist. The lecturer points out the fact that the clothes on originals painting was different with making a change in those clothes some error appeared in the shadowing of this art piece.
Lastly, the reading and the passage discuss the panel that the painting was painted on. The reading points out that this artist always painted on a wood panel but the back of the panel proves otherwise, stating the painting was painted on several pieces glued together. However, the professor says that the original paining was in fact on a wood panel as always but the changes happened on a glued one.
All in all, the author concludes by stating these three reasons that the painting did not belong to this artist. However, the lecturer believes that Rembrandt paint this piece but the changed made everyone believes otherwise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. other people prefer to prepare and eat at home. which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- it is important to keep our old friend than making new friends 70
- Rembrandt painting 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...clothes are a mix of luxury and normal. The professor, on the other hand, illustrat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, look, so, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 340.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89705882353 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41724628137 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432352941176 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.2897803185 49.2860985944 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.928571429 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381491125663 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152203727356 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127251448958 0.0662205650399 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252080027337 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048306517946 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.