A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
We humans are always constantly learning new ideas and knowledge through out our life; from birth, understanding the small world around us to the maturity learning the wider experiences of the world. And among those, being enrolled in schools and getting to learn various aspects of learning is one of the most important criteria for our development. A good education system values each and every individual. That is the reason, in whatsoever manner being taught with the same curriculum time and again dampens the curiosity for learning.
Students being enrolled in schools are not the same. Noone is. Everyone has their own interests that spark enjoyment in their life. Students have varying interests. They have a varying amount of learning skills. One might be more obtused in one subject than others. One might be more acute in one subject than another. This has been found throughout the history. Einstein, if wasn't given education to learn what he wanted, he might not have theorized about relativity, space and time. Such examples are many throughout history.
It can be surmised that the same national curriculum can be beneficial in some ways. But then the question of whether the repetition of the same subjects year after year might result in students gaining more knowledge is questionable. It's good to speculate that basic courses like science, math, social studies, history can actually be taught ubiquitously to all. But that's just the tip of the iceberg. They only add value to normal life, to understand the quotidian world in front of us. But doesn't add any values to what students really interested in.
Students do have their own skills and expertise. Some might be interested in music, some might be interested in sports. Some might be more academic. The possibilities are many to interest an individual. A jack of all, master of none might not do good later in later stages of life. So, the school should find a way to incorporate these specialities in the curriculum itself. In retrospect, studying the same courses time and again slowly dampens the curiosity of an individual.
Not only being repetitive of curriculum, but the state of flux after completion of school also arises. Students become confused on what they are to study. And thus, are forced to choose, yet another, the course that everyone is studying. This leaves a little room for honing one's skills and interests. This, in many ways, hinders the progress of an individual, and thus for a later stage in life.
Therefore, it's not an efficient method to completely impose the same school curriculum to students. But the focus should be both end of the spectrum - a right curriculum that balances the academic as well as personal skills of the students. Incorporating a method to hone one's inner interests and skills should be taken into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of weat 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 16
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...tantly learning new ideas and knowledge through out our life; from birth, understanding the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...nd throughout the history. Einstein, if wasnt given education to learn what he wanted...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...an be beneficial in some ways. But then the question of whether the repetition of the same subjects yea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 369, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ally be taught ubiquitously to all. But thats just the tip of the iceberg. They only ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 494, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...the quotidian world in front of us. But doesnt add any values to what students really ...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 276, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...g. This leaves a little room for honing ones skills and interests. This, in many way...
^^^^
Line 21, column 12, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... a later stage in life. Therefore, its not an efficient method to completely i...
^^^
Line 21, column 198, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...t curriculum that balances the academic as well as personal skills of the students. Incorp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, really, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05073995772 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66544796699 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513742071882 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.588628145 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.2647058824 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.9117647059 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.23529411765 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0146166867 0.243740707755 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00383372868245 0.0831039109588 5% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0125150158846 0.0758088955206 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00955103188291 0.150359130593 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140495902189 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.