Products on advertisements are better than they are.
Without a shadow of a doubt, advertisements play a vital role in introducing new products to the community. Companies by spending money on advertising can persuade customers to buy those stuff. Some people believe that most advertisements make their product seem better than they really are, while others think that’s not true. However, from my perspective, I totally agree that products on advertisements are better than they are for two reasons.
First of all, companies usually use famous actors, singers or cartoon characters to introduce their products. Most of the time, people who have an interest in the actors or famous people, they’ll tend to buy those products. Take my friend as an example, she loves BTS - a famous boy group from Korea. BTS once advertise for Puma and my friend immediately buy Puma sneakers even though she never wearing sneakers. Another good example, I admire Soobin Hoang Son very much, and every time he advertises for a brand, I save money to buy that item, which is simply what I admire him.
Second of all, advertising is now very diverse and suitable for different ages. Companies are aware of market trends and customer choices, so they always make ads that match their customers' goals in order to get their attention and persuade them to buy. For example, women are always interested in the home, taking care of the family, so ads like home care, furniture, etc. will attract them. Moreover, women are also interested in their appearance so ads about beauty, spa, jewelry, ... will interest them.
To sum it all up, it is easy to see that advertisement companies use various elements to make their advertisements look better and it’s just a tool to attract people's attention and make more money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wears'.
Suggestion: wears
...buy Puma sneakers even though she never wearing sneakers. Another good example, I admir...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, moreover, really, second, so, while, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05479452055 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7131794073 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619863013699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6231544918 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.25 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290547286022 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899599035919 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131022186166 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192192640463 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197019570726 0.056905535591 346% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.